From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752245AbcF3Hwj (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 30 Jun 2016 03:52:39 -0400
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:58866 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751994AbcF3Hwi (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 30 Jun 2016 03:52:38 -0400
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:53:58 +0100
From: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
To: Koan-Sin Tan <koansin.tan@gmail.com>
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, yuyang.du@intel.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
        mgalbraith@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
        mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] sched: Clean-ups and asymmetric cpu capacity
 support
Message-ID: <20160630075357.GB12540@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
References: <1466615004-3503-1-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
 <1467109227-25635-1-git-send-email-koansin.tan@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1467109227-25635-1-git-send-email-koansin.tan@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 06:20:27PM +0800, Koan-Sin Tan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I tested these patches with patches from your preview branch [1] and some
> platform specific patches on MediaTek MT8173 EVB (integrated branch at [2])
> 
> > Test 0:
> > 	for i in `seq 1 10`; \
> > 	       do sysbench --test=cpu --max-time=3 --num-threads=1 run; \
> > 	       done \
> > 	| awk '{if ($4=="events:") {print $5; sum +=$5; runs +=1}} \
> > 	       END {print "Average events: " sum/runs}'
> > Target: ARM TC2 (2xA15+3xA7)
> > 
> > 	(Higher is better)
> > tip:	Average events: 146.9
> > patch:	Average events: 217.9
> 
> Target: MediaTek MT8173 EVB (2xA53+2xA72)
> 
> w/o capacity patches:
> 	274.7 (actually, it varies a lot between 194 and 329

The variation you mention is consistent with our observations on both
TC2 and Juno. Most times you get either big or little performance, and
occasionally a number in between.

> w/ capacity patches:
> 	328.7
> 
> > Test 1:
> > 	perf stat --null --repeat 10 -- \
> > 	perf bench sched messaging -g 50 -l 5000
> > 
> > Target: Intel IVB-EP (2*10*2)
> > 
> > tip:    4.861970420 seconds time elapsed ( +-  1.39% )
> > patch:  4.886204224 seconds time elapsed ( +-  0.75% )
> > 
> > Target: ARM TC2 A7-only (3xA7) (-l 1000)
> > 
> > tip:    61.485682596 seconds time elapsed ( +-  0.07% )
> > patch:  62.667950130 seconds time elapsed ( +-  0.36% )
> > 
> 
> Target: MediaTek MT8173 EVB A53-only (2xA7) (-l 1000)
> 
> w/o capacity patches:
> 	72.663181227 seconds time elapsed ( +-  1.62% )
> 	71.502263666 seconds time elapsed ( +-  0.45% ) 
> 	73.707466212 seconds time elapsed ( +-  0.99% )
>         73.623523997 seconds time elapsed ( +-  1.85% )
>      	74.150137066 seconds time elapsed ( +-  1.41% )
> 
> w/ capacity patches:
> 	70.360055056 seconds time elapsed ( +-  1.58% ) 
> 	69.884793481 seconds time elapsed ( +-  0.78% )
> 	73.395917166 seconds time elapsed ( +-  1.86% )
> 	70.082440427 seconds time elapsed ( +-  1.66% )
> 	69.365401758 seconds time elapsed ( +-  0.80% )
> 
> Tested-by: Koan-Sin Tan <freedom.tan@mediatek.com>

Thanks for testing.

Morten