linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, 1vier1@web.de,
	felixh@informatik.uni-bremen.de, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipc/sem.c: Fix complex_count vs. simple op race
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 09:52:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160701165258.GA27566@linux-80c1.suse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac93292c-c995-9c05-9e97-06c19ea7a2bf@colorfullife.com>

On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, Manfred Spraul wrote:

>On 06/28/2016 07:27 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:

>If I understand it right, it means that spin_lock() is both an acquire 
>and a release - for qspinlocks.

I wouldn't say that: the _Q_LOCKED_VAL stores are still unordered inside
the acquire region but no further than the the unlock store-release; which
is fine for regular mutual exclusion.

>It this valid for all spinlock implementations, for all architectures?
>Otherwise: How can I detect in generic code if I can rely on a release 
>inside spin_lock()?

With ticket locks this was never an issue as special lock readers
(spin_unlock_wait(), spin_is_locked()) will always see the lock taken as
they observe waiters by adding itself to the tail -- something the above
commit mimics and piggy backs on to save expensive smp_rmb().

In addition, see 726328d92a4 (locking/spinlock, arch: Update and fix
spin_unlock_wait() implementations).

Thanks,
Davidlohr

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-01 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-15  5:23 linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-18 19:39 ` Manfred Spraul
2016-06-18 20:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] ipc/sem.c: Fix complex_count vs. simple op race Manfred Spraul
2016-06-18 20:02   ` [PATCH 2/2] ipc/sem: sem_lock with hysteresis Manfred Spraul
2016-06-21 20:29     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-06-25 17:37       ` Manfred Spraul
2016-06-28 17:54         ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-06-20 23:04   ` [PATCH 1/2] ipc/sem.c: Fix complex_count vs. simple op race Andrew Morton
2016-06-23 18:55     ` Manfred Spraul
2016-06-21  0:30   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-06-23 19:22     ` Manfred Spraul
2016-06-28  5:27       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-06-30 19:28         ` Manfred Spraul
2016-07-01 16:52           ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2016-06-25 17:37 [PATCH 0/2] ipc/sem.c: sem_lock fixes Manfred Spraul
2016-06-25 17:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] ipc/sem.c: Fix complex_count vs. simple op race Manfred Spraul
2016-07-13  5:06 [PATCH 0/2] ipc/sem.c: sem_lock fixes Manfred Spraul
2016-07-13  5:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] ipc/sem.c: Fix complex_count vs. simple op race Manfred Spraul
2016-07-16  1:27   ` Davidlohr Bueso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160701165258.GA27566@linux-80c1.suse \
    --to=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=1vier1@web.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=felixh@informatik.uni-bremen.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).