From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932610AbcGHPVA (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 8 Jul 2016 11:21:00 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59771 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932536AbcGHPUt (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 8 Jul 2016 11:20:49 -0400
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 17:20:46 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Song Shan Gong <gongss@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, dsahern@gmail.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC V1]s390/perf: fix 'start' address of module's map
Message-ID: <20160708152046.GI31763@krava>
References: <1467856176-8712-1-git-send-email-gongss@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1467856176-8712-1-git-send-email-gongss@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Fri, 08 Jul 2016 15:20:48 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 09:49:36AM +0800, Song Shan Gong wrote:

SNIP

> +libperf-y += sym-handling.o
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/sym-handling.c b/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/sym-handling.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..efe2a50
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/sym-handling.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include "symbol.h"
> +#include "map.h"
> +#include "util.h"
> +#include "machine.h"
> +
> +int arch__fix_module_baseaddr(struct machine *machine,
> +		u64 *start, const char *name)
> +{
> +	char path[PATH_MAX];
> +	char *module_name = strdup(name);

we have a rule to check on every allocated pointer,
pelase check module_name != NULL before using it

> +	int len = strlen(module_name);
> +	FILE *file;
> +	int err = 0;
> +	u64 text_start;
> +	char *line = NULL;
> +	size_t n;
> +	char *sep;
> +
> +	module_name[len - 1] = '\0';
> +	module_name += 1;

hum, why do increase the pointer?

thanks,
jirka