linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	andi@firstfloor.org, eranian@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, davidcc@google.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, namhyung@kernel.org,
	kan.liang@intel.com, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] perf/annotate: Add branch stack / basic block information
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 18:36:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160708163632.GK30927@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160708162733.GJ30909@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 06:27:33PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> I've been thinking of filtering all targets and branches that are
> smaller than 0.1% in order to avoid this, but so far I've just been
> ignoring these things.

Like so... seems to 'work'.

---
 tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index 8eeb151..c78b16f0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -907,6 +907,7 @@ static void annotate__branch_printf(struct block_range *br, u64 addr)
 #if 1
 	if (br->is_target && br->start == addr) {
 		struct block_range *branch = br;
+		double p;
 
 		/*
 		 * Find matching branch to our target.
@@ -914,31 +915,37 @@ static void annotate__branch_printf(struct block_range *br, u64 addr)
 		while (!branch->is_branch)
 			branch = block_range__next(branch);
 
-		if (emit_comment) {
-			emit_comment = false;
-			printf("\t#");
-		}
+		p = 100 *(double)br->entry / branch->coverage;
 
-		/*
-		 * The percentage of coverage joined at this target in relation
-		 * to the next branch.
-		 */
-		printf(" +%.2f%%", 100*(double)br->entry / branch->coverage);
+		if (p > 0.1) {
+			if (emit_comment) {
+				emit_comment = false;
+				printf("\t#");
+			}
+
+			/*
+			 * The percentage of coverage joined at this target in relation
+			 * to the next branch.
+			 */
+			printf(" +%.2f%%", p);
+		}
 	}
 #endif
 	if (br->is_branch && br->end == addr) {
+		double p = 100*(double)br->taken / br->coverage;
 
-		if (emit_comment) {
-			emit_comment = false;
-			printf("\t#");
-		}
+		if (p > 0.1) {
+			if (emit_comment) {
+				emit_comment = false;
+				printf("\t#");
+			}
 
-		/*
-		 * The percentage of coverage leaving at this branch, and
-		 * its prediction ratio.
-		 */
-		printf(" -%.2f%% / %.2f%%", 100*(double)br->taken / br->coverage,
-					    100*(double)br->pred  / br->taken);
+			/*
+			 * The percentage of coverage leaving at this branch, and
+			 * its prediction ratio.
+			 */
+			printf(" -%.2f%% (p:%.2f%%)", p, 100*(double)br->pred  / br->taken);
+		}
 	}
 }
 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-08 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-08 13:30 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] perf: Branch stack annotation and fixes Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-08 13:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] perf/x86/intel: Rework the large PEBS setup code Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-08 16:36   ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-08 22:00     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-08 22:25       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-10  9:08         ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-08 13:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] perf,x86: Ensure perf_sched_cb_{inc,dec}() is only called from pmu::{add,del}() Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-08 13:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] perf/x86/intel: DCE intel_pmu_lbr_del() Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-08 13:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] perf/x86/intel: Remove redundant test from intel_pmu_lbr_add() Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-08 13:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] perf/x86/intel: Clean up LBR state tracking Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-08 13:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] perf: Optimize perF_pmu_sched_task() Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-08 13:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] perf/annotate: Add branch stack / basic block information Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-08 14:55   ` Ingo Molnar
2016-07-08 16:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-08 16:36       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-09-08 16:18         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-09-08 16:41           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-08 16:51             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-08 17:07               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-09-08 16:43           ` Stephane Eranian
2016-09-08 16:59             ` Andi Kleen
2016-09-08 17:11               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-09-09  2:40                 ` Jin, Yao
2016-09-08 18:15             ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160708163632.GK30927@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=davidcc@google.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).