From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751486AbcGOMdI (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2016 08:33:08 -0400 Received: from sauhun.de ([89.238.76.85]:38038 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751040AbcGOMdG (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2016 08:33:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:32:54 +0900 From: Wolfram Sang To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Octavian Purdila , Jarkko Nikula , Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree Message-ID: <20160715123253.GB2620@tetsubishi> References: <20160715121723.0f21f148@canb.auug.org.au> <20160715122853.2474113b@canb.auug.org.au> <2993186.kRkeiY7GfT@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2993186.kRkeiY7GfT@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 02:19:28PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, July 15, 2016 12:28:53 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > >=20 > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:17:23 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > I fixed it up (I think, but it needs more work - see below) and can > >=20 > > For a start, it generates this warning, now: > >=20 > > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:269:20: warning: 'i2c_acpi_add_device' defined b= ut not used [-Wunused-function] > > static acpi_status i2c_acpi_add_device(acpi_handle handle, u32 level, > > ^ >=20 > OK, thanks for the heads-up. Yes, thanks! >=20 > Wolfram, what about if I exposed my "acpi-tables" branch for you to pull? >=20 > You could resolve this in your tree then. I can pull it in, sure. For the fixup, I'd like a commitment from one of the ACPI experts (Jarkko, Mika, Andy), though. Otherwise I'd need to revert given that we are quite late in the cycle already. --3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXiNf1AAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2i58P/2dxl9bwL6qseyDio59ObSWo NzX7FhmXWgKjd0NRGMhHy/TkXES/OM6QJTjKQBPIMRPTS6JoX1KzFGYyE3b+i4n4 OgewmqnPPpqad4h+7m/g5aAQRNHOhmiyMT1kWFVIjMmIBhgdxI3OT8mb67PAm/EG pQkS8x46iwoaJC+aPfRI76C1cYPbvH7TGYpM4SjC9Rklf84lDm2Df8zCo+xGXU8T 6yk0an6/Dcqp5ms+5hjM04LIaz6L4cqBWC6BIpku5bR7Jguq9Dg7rljhVgOuJ9i/ pVEoVsVpgSMpkNJvT4H4nCOMXane15cebdcUxWKOB7SU5RV8cWgW8KhWus8hxeN0 nqDYkuUnR64p9J0o+cE7pUPP/UQS75in9lCx++5MAw+A04sXpmmsFW0k0+TeI4up hCU/EZAgIpoUzi46NEfNE0I7euSCKrQPcIUpHEIDgixUj1z2XlaBAvwbhPbiDnac iVYhKu6PGN9q1WaUNzmMv+uZh5aKHJUPrSPiMs6YsbkfsHOxX9nyedekg39UsNJV Gyu6EZYyyNzH/YhF9870GYiXywjpFTBonHGc5VNgOiBQh+Tm10OED23C7gaz8qiV Kb4OdVRYw8Erh3z2GRWU9rDkE5YDVPFXIaZRTfBCvzxt4rjp/IzoNn0V4rZqPkP7 n+Cgy2m8+sax2wbtbhoZ =rJqU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3uo+9/B/ebqu+fSQ--