From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751816AbcGRHi4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 03:38:56 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40291 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751490AbcGRHiw (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 03:38:52 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:38:45 +0800 From: Dave Young To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Andrew Morton , LKML , Franck Bui , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4 2/2] printk: Add kernel parameter to control writes to /dev/kmsg Message-ID: <20160718073845.GA9088@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> References: <1467969530-5215-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> <1467969530-5215-3-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> <20160715062109.GA4515@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20160715124523.GA26501@nazgul.tnic> <20160716104425.GB3031@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20160717054035.GA16383@nazgul.tnic> <20160718021809.GA6310@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20160718044407.GA20395@nazgul.tnic> <20160718052032.GA7911@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20160718072107.GA22689@nazgul.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160718072107.GA22689@nazgul.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 07:38:52 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/18/16 at 09:21am, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 01:20:32PM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > > Sorry, seems I do not get your point, suppose using the bis defined in your > > patch, shouldn't below work? > > When you supply "printk.devkmsg=" on the kernel command line, then > devkmsg logging setting is final for the current boot because we lock it > with DEVKMSG_LOG_MASK_LOCK, see control_devkmsg() here: Boris, I saw that point and I agreed about that design, what I do not like is the ratelimit part. What in my mind is like below (suppose default=off) printk.devkmsg= on kernel cmdline -> locked, one can not use sysctl to change it -> follow the kernel cmdline setting no printk.devkmsg= on kernel cmdline -> unlocked, default is off, writing to /dev/kmsg is forbidded -> usespace set sysctl printk.devkmsg=on -> writing to /dev/kmsg is allowed. Thanks Dave