From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752095AbcGRTt4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:49:56 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([193.170.194.197]:46677 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751214AbcGRTty (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:49:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 12:49:52 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: "Liang, Kan" Cc: Alexander Duyck , David Miller , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , intel-wired-lan , Netdev , "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Alexey Kuznetsov , James Morris , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Patrick McHardy , Andrew Morton , "keescook@chromium.org" , "viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" , "gorcunov@openvz.org" , "john.stultz@linaro.org" , Alex Duyck , Ben Hutchings , "decot@googlers.com" , "Brandeburg, Jesse" , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/30] Kernel NET policy Message-ID: <20160718194952.GM5871@two.firstfloor.org> References: <1468824984-65318-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F07712C19831@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F07712C19831@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > So where is your policy for power saving? From past experience I can tell you > > There is no policy for power saving yet. I will add it to my todo list. Yes it's interesting to consider. The main goal here is to maximize CPU idle residency? I wonder if that's that much different from the CPU policy. -Andi