From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755883AbcG0MJf (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 08:09:35 -0400 Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:54708 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754131AbcG0MJd (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 08:09:33 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:09:23 +0100 From: One Thousand Gnomes To: Max Staudt Cc: Greg KH , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 8250: option 'force_polling' for buggy IRQs Message-ID: <20160727130923.4c20524b@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <1469468175-15704-1-git-send-email-mstaudt@suse.de> <20160725174712.GA5752@kroah.com> <20160726150856.GA15676@kroah.com> Organization: Intel Corporation X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I simply thought this patch may be useful for other people as well, that's > why I sent it upstream. If you set the IRQ to 0 it should poll anyway (0 means 'no IRQ') so I don't think the option is needed. At least it seems sufficient to get me by when I meet buggy PC BIOSes and the like Alan