From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757695AbcG1UvI (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2016 16:51:08 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com ([209.85.192.193]:33835 "EHLO mail-pf0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751368AbcG1UvG (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2016 16:51:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 13:51:08 -0700 From: Nicolin Chen To: Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: broonie@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, oder_chiou@realtek.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, bardliao@realtek.com Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: rt5659: Add mclk controls Message-ID: <20160728205107.GA6804@Asurada-Nvidia> References: <1469660568-3511-1-git-send-email-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> <579A6DCC.6060401@metafoo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <579A6DCC.6060401@metafoo.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:40:44PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > > + /* Check if MCLK provided */ > > + rt5659->mclk = devm_clk_get(&i2c->dev, "mclk"); > > + if (IS_ERR(rt5659->mclk)) { > > + if (PTR_ERR(rt5659->mclk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) > > + return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > The correct thing to do here is to check if != -ENOENT and then return > the error code. Otherwise you silently ignore errors if a clock was > specified, but there was an error requesting it. Oh..Thanks for the input. Will refine it in v2.