From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org>
Cc: andy.gross@linaro.org, david.brown@linaro.org,
robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, mturquette@baylibre.com,
galak@codeaurora.org, pradeepb@codeaurora.org,
mmcclint@codeaurora.org, varada@codeaurora.org,
sricharan@codeaurora.org, architt@codeaurora.org,
ntelkar@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] clk: qcom: ipq4019: Added the apss cpu pll divider clock node
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:31:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160815223132.GN361@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466516962-18087-3-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org>
On 06/21, Abhishek Sahu wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq4019.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq4019.c
> index 17ca6d3..4c8a97f 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq4019.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq4019.c
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static const char * const gcc_xo_ddr_500_200[] = {
> "xo",
> "gcc_fepll200_clk",
> "gcc_fepll500_clk",
> - "ddrpllapss",
> + "gcc_apps_cpu_plldiv_clk",
> };
>
> #define F(f, s, h, m, n) { (f), (s), (2 * (h) - 1), (m), (n) }
> @@ -571,6 +571,7 @@ static struct clk_rcg2 apps_clk_src = {
> .parent_names = gcc_xo_ddr_500_200,
> .num_parents = 4,
> .ops = &clk_rcg2_ops,
> + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> },
> };
>
> @@ -1273,6 +1274,114 @@ static struct clk_pll_vco gcc_fepll_vco = {
> },
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Round rate function for APPS CPU PLL Clock divider.
> + * It Returns the input rate without changing it. The hardware supported rate
> + * will be calculated in set function by getting the same from frequency table.
> + */
> +static long clk_cpu_div_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long *p_rate)
> +{
> + return rate;
This needs to calculate what the rate will be if clk_set_rate()
is called with the rate parameter. Blindly returning rate back is not
acceptable.
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Clock set rate function for APPS CPU PLL Clock divider.
> + * It looks up the frequency table and updates the PLL divider to corresponding
> + * divider value.
> + */
> +static int clk_cpu_div_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct clk_pll_div *rcg = to_clk_pll_div(hw);
> + const struct freq_tbl *f;
> + u32 mask;
> + int ret;
> +
> + f = qcom_find_freq(rcg->freq_tbl, rate);
> + if (!f)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mask = (BIT(rcg->cdiv.width) - 1) << rcg->cdiv.shift;
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(rcg->cdiv.clkr.regmap,
> + rcg->cdiv.reg, mask,
> + (f->pre_div << rcg->cdiv.shift) & mask);
Why are we masking a value that will be masked by
regmap_update_bits()?
> + udelay(1);
Why do we wait? Please add some comment.
> +
> + return 0;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Clock frequency calculation function for APPS CPU PLL Clock divider.
> + * This clock divider is nonlinear so this function calculates the actual
> + * divider and returns the output frequency by dividing VCO Frequency
> + * with this actual divider value.
> + */
> +static unsigned long clk_cpu_div_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct clk_pll_div *rcg = to_clk_pll_div(hw);
> + u32 cdiv, pre_div;
> +
> + regmap_read(rcg->cdiv.clkr.regmap, rcg->cdiv.reg, &cdiv);
> + cdiv = (cdiv >> rcg->cdiv.shift) & (BIT(rcg->cdiv.width) - 1);
> +
> + /*
> + * Some dividers have value in 0.5 fraction so multiply both VCO
> + * frequency(parent_rate) and pre_div with 2 to make integer
> + * calculation.
> + */
> + if (cdiv > 10)
> + pre_div = (cdiv + 1) * 2;
> + else
> + pre_div = cdiv + 12;
> +
> + return clk_calc_divider_rate(parent_rate * 2, pre_div);
> +};
> +
> +const struct clk_ops clk_regmap_cpu_div_ops = {
static?
> + .round_rate = clk_cpu_div_round_rate,
> + .set_rate = clk_cpu_div_set_rate,
> + .recalc_rate = clk_cpu_div_recalc_rate,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_apps_ddr_pll[] = {
> + {380000000, P_XO, 0xD, 0},
> + {409000000, P_XO, 0xC, 0, 0},
> + {444000000, P_XO, 0xB, 0, 0},
> + {484000000, P_XO, 0xA, 0, 0},
> + {507000000, P_XO, 0x9, 0, 0},
> + {532000000, P_XO, 0x8, 0, 0},
> + {560000000, P_XO, 0x7, 0, 0},
> + {592000000, P_XO, 0x6, 0, 0},
> + {626000000, P_XO, 0x5, 0, 0},
> + {666000000, P_XO, 0x4, 0, 0},
> + {710000000, P_XO, 0x3, 0, 0},
> + {761000000, P_XO, 0x2, 0, 0},
> + {819000000, P_XO, 0x1, 0, 0},
> + {888000000, P_XO, 0x0, 0, 0},
Style nits from before apply here (lowercase, spaces)
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_pll_div gcc_apps_cpu_plldiv_clk = {
> + .cdiv.reg = 0x2E020,
> + .cdiv.shift = 4,
> + .cdiv.width = 4,
> + .cdiv.clkr = {
> + .enable_reg = 0x2E000,
> + .enable_mask = BIT(0),
> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gcc_apps_cpu_plldiv_clk",
> + .parent_names = (const char *[]){
> + "gcc_apps_ddrpll_vco",
> + },
> + .num_parents = 1,
> + .ops = &clk_regmap_cpu_div_ops,
> + },
> + },
> + .freq_tbl = ftbl_apps_ddr_pll,
> +};
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-15 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-21 13:49 [PATCH v2 0/5] Patches for QCOM IPQ4019 clock driver Abhishek Sahu
2016-06-21 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: qcom: ipq4019: Added the clock nodes and operations for pll Abhishek Sahu
2016-08-15 22:19 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-06-21 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] clk: qcom: ipq4019: Added the apss cpu pll divider clock node Abhishek Sahu
2016-08-15 22:31 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2016-06-21 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] clk: qcom: ipq4019: Added the nodes for pcnoc Abhishek Sahu
2016-08-15 22:27 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-06-21 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] clk: qcom: ipq4019: Added the all frequencies for apps cpu Abhishek Sahu
2016-08-15 22:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-06-21 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] clk: qcom: ipq4019: Added the cpu clock frequency change notifier Abhishek Sahu
2016-08-15 22:26 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160815223132.GN361@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=absahu@codeaurora.org \
--cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
--cc=architt@codeaurora.org \
--cc=david.brown@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mmcclint@codeaurora.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=ntelkar@codeaurora.org \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=pradeepb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=varada@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).