From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932393AbcHPOHq (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:07:46 -0400
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:48339 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S932225AbcHPOHo (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:07:44 -0400
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 16:07:38 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [Documentation] State of CPU controller in cgroup v2
Message-ID: <20160816140738.GW6879@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20160805170752.GK2542@mtj.duckdns.org>
 <1470474291.4117.243.camel@gmail.com>
 <20160810220944.GB3085@cmpxchg.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160810220944.GB3085@cmpxchg.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 06:09:44PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:

> [ That, and a disturbing number of emotional outbursts against
>   systemd, which has nothing to do with any of this. ]

Oh, so I'm entirely dreaming this then:

  https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/3905

Completely unrelated.

Also, the argument there seems unfair at best, you don't need cpu-v2 for
buffered write control, you only need memcg and block co-mounted.