From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Denys Vlasenko" <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Brian Gerst" <brgerst@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@amacapital.net>,
lkp@01.org, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [x86/hweight] 65ea11ec6a: will-it-scale.per_process_ops 9.3% improvement
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 05:45:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160818034513.GA21415@nazgul.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r39n58sv.fsf@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com>
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 03:29:04PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote:
> branch-miss-rate decreased from ~0.30% to ~0.043%.
>
> So I guess there are some code alignment change, which caused decreased
> branch miss rate.
Hrrm, I still can't imagine how that would happen if the machine
supports POPCNT and we never call the __sw_hweight* variants. Or does
it?
Can you paste /proc/cpuinfo from that Sandy Bridge-EP box?
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-18 3:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-16 14:26 [lkp] [x86/hweight] 65ea11ec6a: will-it-scale.per_process_ops 9.3% improvement kernel test robot
2016-08-16 16:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-08-16 17:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-16 23:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-08-17 5:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-17 22:29 ` [LKP] " Huang, Ying
2016-08-18 3:45 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2016-08-18 3:54 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-18 4:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-25 9:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-25 10:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-08-25 11:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-08-25 20:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-08-18 3:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-08-17 6:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160818034513.GA21415@nazgul.tnic \
--to=bp@suse.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).