From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932232AbcIAKGw (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:06:52 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:48224 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752079AbcIAKGr (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2016 06:06:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:06:31 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Chris Metcalf Cc: Gilad Ben Yossef , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Rik van Riel , Tejun Heo , Frederic Weisbecker , Thomas Gleixner , "Paul E. McKenney" , Christoph Lameter , Viresh Kumar , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Andy Lutomirski , Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 04/13] task_isolation: add initial support Message-ID: <20160901100631.GQ10153@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1471382376-5443-1-git-send-email-cmetcalf@mellanox.com> <1471382376-5443-5-git-send-email-cmetcalf@mellanox.com> <20160829163352.GV10153@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160830075854.GZ10153@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:32:16AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > On 8/30/2016 3:58 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >What !? I really don't get this, what are you waiting for? Why is > >rescheduling making things better. > > We need to wait for the last dyntick to fire before we can return to > userspace. There are plenty of options as to what we can do in the > meanwhile. Why not keep your _TIF_TASK_ISOLATION_FOO flag set and re-enter the loop? I really don't see how setting TIF_NEED_RESCHED is helping anything.