From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756759AbcIAVHV (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2016 17:07:21 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:44838 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756691AbcIAVHH (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2016 17:07:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 21:43:49 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Chen Gang Cc: Vineet Gupta , Arnd Bergmann , akpm@linux-foundation.org, minchan@kernel.org, vbabka@suse.cz, gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net, mhocko@suse.com, rientjes@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rth@twiddle.net, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, hskinnemoen@gmail.com, egtvedt@samfundet.no, realmz6@gmail.com, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, rkuo@codeaurora.org, tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, james.hogan@imgtec.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, dhowells@redhat.com, deller@gmx.de, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, dalias@libc.org, "David S. Miller" Subject: cmsg newgroup alt.sex.fetish.bool (was Re: [PATCH] arch: all: include: asm: bitops: Use bool instead of int for all bit test functions) Message-ID: <20160901204348.GQ2356@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1472362755-26776-1-git-send-email-chengang@emindsoft.com.cn> <201608291503.41630.arnd@arndb.de> <80e3ae6c-e81d-3541-9051-07ad726b59cd@synopsys.com> <57C4ADD1.6020609@emindsoft.com.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57C4ADD1.6020609@emindsoft.com.cn> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 05:49:05AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: > Could you provide the related proof? > > Or shall I try to analyze about it and get proof? Can you show a proof that it actually improves anything? He who proposes a patch gets to defend it, not the other way round... Al, bloody annoyed