From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1754284AbcIBPHH (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:07:07 -0400
Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:41258 "EHLO muru.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1754073AbcIBPHF (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:07:05 -0400
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 08:06:49 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@gmail.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
        Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
        "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jason Kridner <jkridner@beagleboard.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: am57xx-beagle-x15: Add support for rev B1
Message-ID: <20160902150648.lgbhxvyapo4p3lg3@atomide.com>
References: <20160902090600.27262-1-nm@ti.com>
 <20160902090600.27262-3-nm@ti.com>
 <dd74f5e1-304f-661e-7fd9-f5f81bcfc55e@ti.com>
 <CAOCHtYiFjB-cuABmCiw96spc-De+qNNQYGrjp-MmNDuH2mJ9Bw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOCHtYiFjB-cuABmCiw96spc-De+qNNQYGrjp-MmNDuH2mJ9Bw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-07-23)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

* Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@gmail.com> [160902 06:52]:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> wrote:
> > Instead, it seems to be easier for maintenance and safer overall if the
> > older version has a file of its own which can be kept alone.
> >
> > Also, how about renaming the existing dts to am57xx-beagle-x15-reva2.dts
> > and let the production version be called am57xx-beagle-x15.dts? Surely
> > this will cause some inconvenience to A2 users. But there are few users
> > of those and it might be more intuitive for the majority users if the
> > file for production version is without a specific version string
> > attached. Just a thought though, not sure about it myself either.
> 
> Nak, let's NOT do that to A2 users.
> 
> The am57xx-beagle-x15.dts went mainline in v3.19, u-boot installed on
> devices would need to be updated and this would make bisecting a pain.
> ;)

I agree, let's keep things working without forcing people to update
their u-boot enviroment for the dtb name.

Regards,

Tony