From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752962AbcIDHcw (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Sep 2016 03:32:52 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:57090 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750910AbcIDHcs (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Sep 2016 03:32:48 -0400 Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2016 00:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20160904.003221.1058212775653805315.davem@davemloft.net> To: elfring@users.sourceforge.net Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, adam.buchbinder@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org, rabin@rab.in, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, julia.lawall@lip6.fr, pbonzini@redhat.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, jdelvare@suse.de Subject: Re: sparc: bpf_jit: Rename jump labels in bpf_jit_compile() From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <1365a588-c7c7-717c-1e3d-ceabd71e8479@users.sourceforge.net> <20160903.235916.1892276070318494855.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Sun, 04 Sep 2016 00:32:24 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 09:20:55 +0200 > I guess that I will stumble on more software improvement opportunities > you find harder to become comfortable with. Improvement is a matter of opinion. So your statement assumes that your changes are an improvement, and everyone in this thread clearly disagrees with that. This is why everything you are doing here is so irritating. It's not because I find improvements "uncomfortable", but rather it's because your changes are not seen as improvements in the first place.