From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1755028AbcIELIH (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 5 Sep 2016 07:08:07 -0400
Received: from mail-lf0-f51.google.com ([209.85.215.51]:34007 "EHLO
        mail-lf0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751648AbcIELIG (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 5 Sep 2016 07:08:06 -0400
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 13:02:10 +0200
From: Anders Darander <anders@chargestorm.se>
To: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>
Cc: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
        Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds-pca963x: add bindings to invert polarity
Message-ID: <20160905110210.bxno7zx7exmtu774@ad.chargestorm.se>
References: <1462182104-21450-1-git-send-email-anders@chargestorm.se>
 <5729A4AB.5080901@samsung.com>
 <20160504075508.GA22125@ad.chargestorm.se>
 <5729AE59.6000009@schinagl.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5729AE59.6000009@schinagl.nl>
X-Accept-Language: sv, en, de
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5AF0 B2E9 78FE 9D75 D110  6F8F 3E31 84D7 920E 938C
X-GPG-Key-Id: 0x920E938C
X-GPG-Keyserver: hkp://keys.gnupg.net
Organization: ChargeStorm AB
User-Agent: NeoMutt/ (1.7.0)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

* Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl> [160504 10:10]:
> On 04-05-16 09:55, Anders Darander wrote:
> > * Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> [160504 09:28]:
> > > Please note that there has already been an attempt to add
> > > the support for inverted output polarity to this driver and related
> > > discussion [1]. This thread remains quiet for around two weeks.
> > Ah, nice coincidence! Unfortunately, I made the work earlier than his
> > posting, otherwise I could have spent the time on somethinge else. ;)
> Sorry to be so slacking with submitting this, I've been sitting on it for 6
> months now :) I just kept postponing in submitting it. But as they say,
> great minds, and all that.

> > Well, then I hope v2 of his patches comes along.

Any news on a v2?

Otherwise, could we agree on a dt binding for the inverted output, and
look into merging that prior to the rest of the series? I'd like to get
rid of my local patch... 

Cheers,
Anders