linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
Cc: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, fabio.estevam@nxp.com,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: phy: generic: request regulator optionally
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 09:22:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160906082210.GE3950@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mvjlmpyo.fsf@linux.intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 793 bytes --]

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 10:45:19AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> writes:

> > According to the device tree bindings the vcc-supply is optional.

This is nonsense unless the device can work without this supply.  Given
that the supply is called VCC that doesn't seem entirely likely.

> > +	nop->vcc = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vcc");
> >  	if (IS_ERR(nop->vcc)) {
> >  		dev_dbg(dev, "Error getting vcc regulator: %ld\n",
> >  					PTR_ERR(nop->vcc));
> > -		if (needs_vcc)
> > -			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > +		if (needs_vcc || PTR_ERR(nop->vcc) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > +			return PTR_ERR(nop->vcc);

> does this look okay from a regulator API perspective?

That's how to use _get_optional() but it's really unusual that you
should be using _get_optional().

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-06  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-04  4:04 [PATCH] usb: phy: generic: request regulator optionally Stefan Agner
2016-09-06  7:45 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-09-06  8:22   ` Mark Brown [this message]
2016-09-06 18:01     ` Stefan Agner
2016-09-07  7:25       ` Roger Quadros
2016-09-07  8:03         ` Felipe Balbi
2016-09-07 18:53       ` Mark Brown
2016-09-07 20:32         ` Stefan Agner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160906082210.GE3950@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=balbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=fabio.estevam@nxp.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefan@agner.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).