From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix update_min_vruntime() to get proper min_vruntime
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 11:46:00 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160909024559.GC2279@X58A-UD3R> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160906084839.GG10153@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 10:48:39AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:05:17PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > From 295895be8befbab040d6054bb8186c03daabcedd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
> > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 12:22:26 +0900
> > Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix update_min_vruntime() to get proper
> > min_vruntime
> >
> > Commit 97a7142 'sched/fair: Make update_min_vruntime() more readable'
> > introduces a bug that cfs_rq gets a wrong min_vruntime if
> > !cfs_rq->rb_leftmost && cfs_rq->curr. This fixes it and makes it more
> > readable and simple.
>
> Urgh, I actually stared at that patch for quite a time and somehow
> convinced myself it was good. I actually considered that scenario I
> think.
>
> /me thinks more..
>
> Argh, I'm an idiot, you're right. By using min_vruntime() on
> cfs_rq->curr we take the leftmost and fail to advance min_vruntime in
> that case.
>
> I'll ask Ingo to take the patch out.
Ok. But I think the combined one is more readable.
Don't you think so. It's ok even if you don't.
Thank you,
Byungchul
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-09 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-06 5:05 [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix update_min_vruntime() to get proper min_vruntime Byungchul Park
2016-09-06 8:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-09 2:46 ` Byungchul Park [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160909024559.GC2279@X58A-UD3R \
--to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).