From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752907AbcIIQec (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2016 12:34:32 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:54563 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750882AbcIIQe3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2016 12:34:29 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,305,1470726000"; d="scan'208";a="1053692739" Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:34:21 -0600 From: Ross Zwisler To: "Theodore Ts'o" , Jan Kara , Ross Zwisler , Xiao Guangrong , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams , Yumei Huang , KVM , "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , LKML , Linux ACPI , Stefan Hajnoczi Subject: Re: DAX can not work on virtual nvdimm device Message-ID: <20160909163421.GB18554@linux.intel.com> References: <600ac51c-0f61-6e53-9bfa-669c85494d1f@linux.intel.com> <20160829193014.GB16738@linux.intel.com> <61d5c470-a8bf-86d5-d1fe-b4b577a85967@linux.intel.com> <25098f37-53f7-6d5d-0b1a-8469bab51a9f@linux.intel.com> <20160902025738.GA26108@linux.intel.com> <20160906150620.GJ28922@quack2.suse.cz> <20160908204708.GA15167@linux.intel.com> <20160909091925.GF22777@quack2.suse.cz> <20160909140327.r2j64s5xdaxnnxhx@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160909140327.r2j64s5xdaxnnxhx@thunk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 10:03:27AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 11:19:25AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > > > > 1. make the guest kernel based on your tree, the top commit is > > > > > > 10d7902fa0e82b (dax: unmap/truncate on device shutdown) and > > > > > > the config file can be found in this thread. > > What git tree is 10d7902fa0e82b from? It's from djbw's libnvdimm tree. https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/djbw/nvdimm.git/ I don't think that commit is relevant, though. I believe this should reproduce with a vanilla v4.7 tree. I can verify if you'd like. > > Hum, nothing unusual in there. I've tried reproducing on a local SLE11 SP3 > > machine (which is from about the same time) but everything works as > > expected there. Shrug... > > I just tried reproducing it via "gce-xfstests --pmem-device shell" > with a downgraded e2fsprogs to stock upstream 1.42.12, and I can't > reproduce it with the ext4.git tree. I'm not sure whether the git > commit is critical, though. Is this a regression that was working > before? I'm not sure if we've ever tested Centos6/RHEL6 with DAX. It could be that it has never worked. > Or it's possible that Red Hat did something weird with the CentOS 6 > e2fsprogs....