From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755605AbcIJQMe (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Sep 2016 12:12:34 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:59995 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754753AbcIJQMc (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Sep 2016 12:12:32 -0400 Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 18:12:28 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Parav Pandit Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Matan Barak , Tejun Heo , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , Doug Ledford , Liran Liss , "Hefty, Sean" , Jason Gunthorpe , Haggai Eran , Jonathan Corbet , james.l.morris@oracle.com, serge@hallyn.com, Or Gerlitz , Andrew Morton , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv12 1/3] rdmacg: Added rdma cgroup controller Message-ID: <20160910161228.GB29259@lst.de> References: <1472632647-1525-1-git-send-email-pandit.parav@gmail.com> <1472632647-1525-2-git-send-email-pandit.parav@gmail.com> <61101e8b-5776-c0bc-b3ea-d8b984eebabf@mellanox.com> <20160831211618.GA12660@htj.duckdns.org> <9b6a346d-af4c-1e5f-0144-f68fb8e46c27@mellanox.com> <20160901084406.GA4115@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 01:25:13PM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote: > > a) delay cgroups support until the grand rewrite is done > > b) add it now and deal with the consequences later > > > Can we do (b) now and differ adding any HW resources to cgroup until > they are clearly called out. > Architecture and APIs are already in place to support this. Sounds fine to me. The only thing I want to avoid is pie in the sky "future proofing" that leads to horrible architectures. And I assume that's what Matan proposed.