From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763331AbcIOJ1k (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2016 05:27:40 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:37652 "EHLO mail-wm0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754070AbcIOJ1i (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2016 05:27:38 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 11:27:29 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jann Horn , Andrew Lutomirski , Brian Gerst , Peter Anvin , the arch/x86 maintainers Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] x86/dumpstack: Pin the target stack in save_stack_trace_tsk() Message-ID: <20160915092729.GA28075@gmail.com> References: <7cd5e328dc75d8ccd912e5783665de34503f7c63.1473801993.git.luto@kernel.org> <20160915063747.GC13992@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Linus Torvalds wrote: > It absolutely is - compared to the vmalloc costs. Andy has quite noticeable > slowdowns without the stack reuse - and the stack reuse requires the delayed > freeing. With the stack reuse, fork/exit actually sped up. Ok, great, that's convincing! I'm still applying it two-phase and I'll wait for v2 of the second half of the series, to have the fix Josh alluded to. Thanks, Ingo