From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752422AbcIOQMV (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:12:21 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:58708 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751667AbcIOQMM (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:12:12 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,339,1470726000"; d="scan'208";a="8921753" Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 21:50:30 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: Peter Griffin , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, patrice.chotard@st.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, airlied@linux.ie, kraxel@redhat.com, ohad@wizery.com, lee.jones@linaro.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/19] Add support for FDMA DMA controller and slim core rproc found on STi chipsets Message-ID: <20160915162030.GX13920@localhost> References: <1473081421-16555-1-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> <20160913093107.GA10953@griffinp-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-2nd> <20160913180616.GD21438@tuxbot> <20160914130739.GE13920@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160914130739.GE13920@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 06:37:40PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:06:16AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > > I hate to send a ping, > > > > Sorry about that. > > > > > but do you think we can merge this fdma series? It has gone > > > through quite a few review rounds now. > > > > > > > I think the remoteproc part looks good. > > yeah I was waiting for ack on other patches. But looks like at least > remoteproc ones have it > > > > Vinod, I don't have any changes queued in remoteproc that should cause > > merge issues. If you want to you could take the remoteproc patch > > through your tree. > > I rechecked the dma part, they look good to me, so I should be able to apply > these. I will wait a day for ack/nacks. It is the time to speak up :) And I have applied thru 9th patch. Others are applied by Patrice. Btw you should send drm ones to drm folks separately and not in this series.. Thanks -- ~Vinod