From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>, Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>, Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>, Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>, Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Subject: [PATCH v2 4/7] sched: Add wrappers for lockdep_(un)pin_lock() Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:38:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20160921133813.31976-5-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20160921133813.31976-1-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> In preparation for adding diagnostic checks to catch missing calls to update_rq_clock(), provide wrappers for (re)pinning and unpinning rq->lock. Because the pending diagnostic checks allow state to be maintained in rq_flags across pin contexts, swap the 'struct pin_cookie' arguments for 'struct rq_flags *'. Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> --- kernel/sched/core.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ kernel/sched/deadline.c | 10 +++--- kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 ++-- kernel/sched/idle_task.c | 2 +- kernel/sched/rt.c | 6 ++-- kernel/sched/sched.h | 31 ++++++++++++++----- kernel/sched/stop_task.c | 2 +- 7 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 860070fba814..7950c372fca0 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ struct rq *__task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf) rq = task_rq(p); raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p))) { - rf->cookie = lockdep_pin_lock(&rq->lock); + rq_pin_lock(rq, rf); return rq; } raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ struct rq *task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf) * pair with the WMB to ensure we must then also see migrating. */ if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p))) { - rf->cookie = lockdep_pin_lock(&rq->lock); + rq_pin_lock(rq, rf); return rq; } raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); @@ -1184,9 +1184,9 @@ static int __set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, * OK, since we're going to drop the lock immediately * afterwards anyway. */ - lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, rf.cookie); + rq_unpin_lock(rq, &rf); rq = move_queued_task(rq, p, dest_cpu); - lockdep_repin_lock(&rq->lock, rf.cookie); + rq_repin_lock(rq, &rf); } out: task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf); @@ -1679,7 +1679,7 @@ static inline void ttwu_activate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int en_fl * Mark the task runnable and perform wakeup-preemption. */ static void ttwu_do_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags, - struct pin_cookie cookie) + struct rq_flags *rf) { check_preempt_curr(rq, p, wake_flags); p->state = TASK_RUNNING; @@ -1691,9 +1691,9 @@ static void ttwu_do_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags, * Our task @p is fully woken up and running; so its safe to * drop the rq->lock, hereafter rq is only used for statistics. */ - lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, cookie); + rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf); p->sched_class->task_woken(rq, p); - lockdep_repin_lock(&rq->lock, cookie); + rq_repin_lock(rq, rf); } if (rq->idle_stamp) { @@ -1712,7 +1712,7 @@ static void ttwu_do_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags, static void ttwu_do_activate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags, - struct pin_cookie cookie) + struct rq_flags *rf) { int en_flags = ENQUEUE_WAKEUP; @@ -1727,7 +1727,7 @@ ttwu_do_activate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags, #endif ttwu_activate(rq, p, en_flags); - ttwu_do_wakeup(rq, p, wake_flags, cookie); + ttwu_do_wakeup(rq, p, wake_flags, rf); } /* @@ -1746,7 +1746,7 @@ static int ttwu_remote(struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags) if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) { /* check_preempt_curr() may use rq clock */ update_rq_clock(rq); - ttwu_do_wakeup(rq, p, wake_flags, rf.cookie); + ttwu_do_wakeup(rq, p, wake_flags, &rf); ret = 1; } __task_rq_unlock(rq, &rf); @@ -1759,15 +1759,15 @@ void sched_ttwu_pending(void) { struct rq *rq = this_rq(); struct llist_node *llist = llist_del_all(&rq->wake_list); - struct pin_cookie cookie; struct task_struct *p; unsigned long flags; + struct rq_flags rf; if (!llist) return; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags); - cookie = lockdep_pin_lock(&rq->lock); + rq_pin_lock(rq, &rf); while (llist) { int wake_flags = 0; @@ -1778,10 +1778,10 @@ void sched_ttwu_pending(void) if (p->sched_remote_wakeup) wake_flags = WF_MIGRATED; - ttwu_do_activate(rq, p, wake_flags, cookie); + ttwu_do_activate(rq, p, wake_flags, &rf); } - lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, cookie); + rq_unpin_lock(rq, &rf); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags); } @@ -1870,7 +1870,7 @@ bool cpus_share_cache(int this_cpu, int that_cpu) static void ttwu_queue(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags) { struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu); - struct pin_cookie cookie; + struct rq_flags rf; #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) if (sched_feat(TTWU_QUEUE) && !cpus_share_cache(smp_processor_id(), cpu)) { @@ -1881,9 +1881,9 @@ static void ttwu_queue(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags) #endif raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); - cookie = lockdep_pin_lock(&rq->lock); - ttwu_do_activate(rq, p, wake_flags, cookie); - lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, cookie); + rq_pin_lock(rq, &rf); + ttwu_do_activate(rq, p, wake_flags, &rf); + rq_unpin_lock(rq, &rf); raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); } @@ -2099,7 +2099,7 @@ out: * ensure that this_rq() is locked, @p is bound to this_rq() and not * the current task. */ -static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct task_struct *p, struct pin_cookie cookie) +static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf) { struct rq *rq = task_rq(p); @@ -2116,11 +2116,11 @@ static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct task_struct *p, struct pin_cookie cookie * disabled avoiding further scheduler activity on it and we've * not yet picked a replacement task. */ - lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, cookie); + rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf); raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); raw_spin_lock(&p->pi_lock); raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); - lockdep_repin_lock(&rq->lock, cookie); + rq_repin_lock(rq, rf); } if (!(p->state & TASK_NORMAL)) @@ -2131,7 +2131,7 @@ static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct task_struct *p, struct pin_cookie cookie if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) ttwu_activate(rq, p, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP); - ttwu_do_wakeup(rq, p, 0, cookie); + ttwu_do_wakeup(rq, p, 0, rf); ttwu_stat(p, smp_processor_id(), 0); out: raw_spin_unlock(&p->pi_lock); @@ -2578,9 +2578,9 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p) * Nothing relies on rq->lock after this, so its fine to * drop it. */ - lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, rf.cookie); + rq_unpin_lock(rq, &rf); p->sched_class->task_woken(rq, p); - lockdep_repin_lock(&rq->lock, rf.cookie); + rq_repin_lock(rq, &rf); } #endif task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf); @@ -2845,7 +2845,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void schedule_tail(struct task_struct *prev) */ static __always_inline struct rq * context_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, - struct task_struct *next, struct pin_cookie cookie) + struct task_struct *next, struct rq_flags *rf) { struct mm_struct *mm, *oldmm; @@ -2877,7 +2877,7 @@ context_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, * of the scheduler it's an obvious special-case), so we * do an early lockdep release here: */ - lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, cookie); + rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf); spin_release(&rq->lock.dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_); /* Here we just switch the register state and the stack. */ @@ -3241,7 +3241,7 @@ static inline void schedule_debug(struct task_struct *prev) * Pick up the highest-prio task: */ static inline struct task_struct * -pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct pin_cookie cookie) +pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf) { const struct sched_class *class = &fair_sched_class; struct task_struct *p; @@ -3252,20 +3252,20 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct pin_cookie cookie */ if (likely(prev->sched_class == class && rq->nr_running == rq->cfs.h_nr_running)) { - p = fair_sched_class.pick_next_task(rq, prev, cookie); + p = fair_sched_class.pick_next_task(rq, prev, rf); if (unlikely(p == RETRY_TASK)) goto again; /* assumes fair_sched_class->next == idle_sched_class */ if (unlikely(!p)) - p = idle_sched_class.pick_next_task(rq, prev, cookie); + p = idle_sched_class.pick_next_task(rq, prev, rf); return p; } again: for_each_class(class) { - p = class->pick_next_task(rq, prev, cookie); + p = class->pick_next_task(rq, prev, rf); if (p) { if (unlikely(p == RETRY_TASK)) goto again; @@ -3319,7 +3319,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt) { struct task_struct *prev, *next; unsigned long *switch_count; - struct pin_cookie cookie; + struct rq_flags rf; struct rq *rq; int cpu; @@ -3353,7 +3353,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt) */ smp_mb__before_spinlock(); raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); - cookie = lockdep_pin_lock(&rq->lock); + rq_pin_lock(rq, &rf); rq->clock_skip_update <<= 1; /* promote REQ to ACT */ @@ -3375,7 +3375,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt) to_wakeup = wq_worker_sleeping(prev); if (to_wakeup) - try_to_wake_up_local(to_wakeup, cookie); + try_to_wake_up_local(to_wakeup, &rf); } } switch_count = &prev->nvcsw; @@ -3384,7 +3384,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt) if (task_on_rq_queued(prev)) update_rq_clock(rq); - next = pick_next_task(rq, prev, cookie); + next = pick_next_task(rq, prev, &rf); clear_tsk_need_resched(prev); clear_preempt_need_resched(); rq->clock_skip_update = 0; @@ -3395,9 +3395,9 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt) ++*switch_count; trace_sched_switch(preempt, prev, next); - rq = context_switch(rq, prev, next, cookie); /* unlocks the rq */ + rq = context_switch(rq, prev, next, &rf); /* unlocks the rq */ } else { - lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, cookie); + rq_unpin_lock(rq, &rf); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock); } @@ -5487,7 +5487,7 @@ static void migrate_tasks(struct rq *dead_rq) { struct rq *rq = dead_rq; struct task_struct *next, *stop = rq->stop; - struct pin_cookie cookie; + struct rq_flags rf; int dest_cpu; /* @@ -5519,8 +5519,8 @@ static void migrate_tasks(struct rq *dead_rq) /* * pick_next_task assumes pinned rq->lock. */ - cookie = lockdep_pin_lock(&rq->lock); - next = pick_next_task(rq, &fake_task, cookie); + rq_pin_lock(rq, &rf); + next = pick_next_task(rq, &fake_task, &rf); BUG_ON(!next); next->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, next); @@ -5533,7 +5533,7 @@ static void migrate_tasks(struct rq *dead_rq) * because !cpu_active at this point, which means load-balance * will not interfere. Also, stop-machine. */ - lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, cookie); + rq_unpin_lock(rq, &rf); raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); raw_spin_lock(&next->pi_lock); raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c index 0c75bc656178..9c7abab9f61e 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c @@ -663,9 +663,9 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer) * Nothing relies on rq->lock after this, so its safe to drop * rq->lock. */ - lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, rf.cookie); + rq_unpin_lock(rq, &rf); push_dl_task(rq); - lockdep_repin_lock(&rq->lock, rf.cookie); + rq_repin_lock(rq, &rf); } #endif @@ -1119,7 +1119,7 @@ static struct sched_dl_entity *pick_next_dl_entity(struct rq *rq, } struct task_struct * -pick_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct pin_cookie cookie) +pick_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf) { struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se; struct task_struct *p; @@ -1134,9 +1134,9 @@ pick_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct pin_cookie coo * disabled avoiding further scheduler activity on it and we're * being very careful to re-start the picking loop. */ - lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, cookie); + rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf); pull_dl_task(rq); - lockdep_repin_lock(&rq->lock, cookie); + rq_repin_lock(rq, rf); /* * pull_rt_task() can drop (and re-acquire) rq->lock; this * means a stop task can slip in, in which case we need to diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 85ca4ddab0d3..f0032827fb79 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -5718,7 +5718,7 @@ preempt: } static struct task_struct * -pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct pin_cookie cookie) +pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf) { struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = &rq->cfs; struct sched_entity *se; @@ -5831,9 +5831,9 @@ idle: * further scheduler activity on it and we're being very careful to * re-start the picking loop. */ - lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, cookie); + rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf); new_tasks = idle_balance(rq); - lockdep_repin_lock(&rq->lock, cookie); + rq_repin_lock(rq, rf); /* * Because idle_balance() releases (and re-acquires) rq->lock, it is * possible for any higher priority task to appear. In that case we diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle_task.c b/kernel/sched/idle_task.c index dedc81ecbb2e..5a84cc97118f 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/idle_task.c +++ b/kernel/sched/idle_task.c @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int fl } static struct task_struct * -pick_next_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct pin_cookie cookie) +pick_next_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf) { put_prev_task(rq, prev); diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c index d5690b722691..ab79812ee33e 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c @@ -1524,7 +1524,7 @@ static struct task_struct *_pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq) } static struct task_struct * -pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct pin_cookie cookie) +pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf) { struct task_struct *p; struct rt_rq *rt_rq = &rq->rt; @@ -1536,9 +1536,9 @@ pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct pin_cookie coo * disabled avoiding further scheduler activity on it and we're * being very careful to re-start the picking loop. */ - lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, cookie); + rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf); pull_rt_task(rq); - lockdep_repin_lock(&rq->lock, cookie); + rq_repin_lock(rq, rf); /* * pull_rt_task() can drop (and re-acquire) rq->lock; this * means a dl or stop task can slip in, in which case we need diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index 420c05d099c3..bf48e7975c23 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -761,6 +761,26 @@ static inline void rq_clock_skip_update(struct rq *rq, bool skip) rq->clock_skip_update &= ~RQCF_REQ_SKIP; } +struct rq_flags { + unsigned long flags; + struct pin_cookie cookie; +}; + +static inline void rq_pin_lock(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf) +{ + rf->cookie = lockdep_pin_lock(&rq->lock); +} + +static inline void rq_unpin_lock(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf) +{ + lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, rf->cookie); +} + +static inline void rq_repin_lock(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf) +{ + lockdep_repin_lock(&rq->lock, rf->cookie); +} + #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA enum numa_topology_type { NUMA_DIRECT, @@ -1212,7 +1232,7 @@ struct sched_class { */ struct task_struct * (*pick_next_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, - struct pin_cookie cookie); + struct rq_flags *rf); void (*put_prev_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p); #ifdef CONFIG_SMP @@ -1463,11 +1483,6 @@ static inline void sched_rt_avg_update(struct rq *rq, u64 rt_delta) { } static inline void sched_avg_update(struct rq *rq) { } #endif -struct rq_flags { - unsigned long flags; - struct pin_cookie cookie; -}; - struct rq *__task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf) __acquires(rq->lock); struct rq *task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf) @@ -1477,7 +1492,7 @@ struct rq *task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf) static inline void __task_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf) __releases(rq->lock) { - lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, rf->cookie); + rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf); raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); } @@ -1486,7 +1501,7 @@ task_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf) __releases(rq->lock) __releases(p->pi_lock) { - lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, rf->cookie); + rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf); raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, rf->flags); } diff --git a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c index 604297a08b3a..9f69fb630853 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c +++ b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ check_preempt_curr_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) } static struct task_struct * -pick_next_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct pin_cookie cookie) +pick_next_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf) { struct task_struct *stop = rq->stop; -- 2.9.3
next prev parent reply index Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2016-09-21 13:38 [PATCH v2 0/7] sched: Diagnostic checks for missing rq clock updates Matt Fleming 2016-09-21 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] sched/fair: Update the rq clock before detaching tasks Matt Fleming 2016-10-03 12:49 ` Peter Zijlstra 2016-10-03 14:37 ` Matt Fleming 2016-10-03 14:42 ` Peter Zijlstra 2016-09-21 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] sched/fair: Update rq clock before waking up new task Matt Fleming 2016-09-21 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] sched/fair: Update rq clock in task_hot() Matt Fleming 2016-09-21 13:38 ` Matt Fleming [this message] 2017-01-14 12:40 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/core: Add wrappers for lockdep_(un)pin_lock() tip-bot for Matt Fleming 2016-09-21 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] sched/core: Reset RQCF_ACT_SKIP before unpinning rq->lock Matt Fleming 2017-01-14 12:41 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Matt Fleming 2016-09-21 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] sched/fair: Push rq lock pin/unpin into idle_balance() Matt Fleming 2017-01-14 12:41 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Matt Fleming 2016-09-21 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] sched/core: Add debug code to catch missing update_rq_clock() Matt Fleming 2016-09-21 15:58 ` Petr Mladek 2016-09-21 19:08 ` Matt Fleming 2016-09-21 19:46 ` Thomas Gleixner 2016-09-22 0:44 ` Sergey Senozhatsky 2016-09-22 8:04 ` Peter Zijlstra 2016-09-22 8:36 ` Jan Kara 2016-09-22 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra 2016-09-22 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-01-14 12:44 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/core: Add debugging code to catch missing update_rq_clock() calls tip-bot for Matt Fleming [not found] ` <87tw8gutp6.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> 2017-01-30 21:34 ` Matt Fleming 2017-01-31 8:35 ` Michael Ellerman 2017-01-31 11:00 ` Sachin Sant 2017-01-31 11:48 ` Mike Galbraith 2017-01-31 17:22 ` Ross Zwisler 2017-02-02 15:55 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-02-02 22:01 ` Matt Fleming 2017-02-03 3:05 ` Mike Galbraith 2017-02-03 4:33 ` Sachin Sant 2017-02-03 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-02-03 12:59 ` Mike Galbraith 2017-02-03 13:37 ` Peter Zijlstra 2017-02-03 13:52 ` Mike Galbraith 2017-02-03 15:44 ` Paul E. McKenney 2017-02-03 15:54 ` Paul E. McKenney 2017-02-06 6:23 ` Sachin Sant 2017-02-06 15:10 ` Paul E. McKenney 2017-02-06 15:14 ` Paul E. McKenney 2017-02-03 13:04 ` Borislav Petkov 2017-02-22 9:03 ` Wanpeng Li 2017-02-24 9:16 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/core: Fix update_rq_clock() splat on hotplug (and suspend/resume) tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20160921133813.31976-5-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \ --to=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \ --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \ --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \ --cc=jack@suse.cz \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=luca.abeni@unitn.it \ --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \ --cc=mingo@kernel.org \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=pmladek@suse.com \ --cc=riel@redhat.com \ --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \ --cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \ --cc=yuyang.du@intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0 lkml/git/0.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1 lkml/git/1.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2 lkml/git/2.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/3 lkml/git/3.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4 lkml/git/4.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5 lkml/git/5.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6 lkml/git/6.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7 lkml/git/7.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8 lkml/git/8.git git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/9 lkml/git/9.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 lkml lkml/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml \ linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org public-inbox-index lkml Example config snippet for mirrors Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git