From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754463AbcI1Vpu (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2016 17:45:50 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:60199 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754001AbcI1Vpq (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2016 17:45:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:45:43 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Doug Ledford Cc: "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Christoph Hellwig , Greg KH , Oleg Drokin , Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rdma tree Message-ID: <20160929074543.5bb734af@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <57EBDAFB.9060204@redhat.com> References: <20160927112334.3615159e@canb.auug.org.au> <20160928114348.2832fe46@canb.auug.org.au> <57EBDAFB.9060204@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Doug, On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:00:11 -0400 Doug Ledford wrote: > > That doesn't seem like a particularly good thing to put in. Wouldn't > you end up just reverting it later when they fix lustre? And are you > going to revert the revert when it breaks again and revert the revert of > the revert when it's fixed again? That just seems a lot of churn. I > thought it was generally accepted that things in staging might or might > not work and if they don't, we don't care? Am I wrong on that? The allmodconfig build needs to work. Linus does an allmodconfig build as part of his testing ... Part of the fix patch should reenable building of the currently broken code. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell