From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S932791AbcJGPaO (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:30:14 -0400
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:59712 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S934692AbcJGPaI (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:30:08 -0400
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 17:30:14 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>, Alon Ronen <aronen@juniper.net>,
        Debjit Ghosh <dghosh@juniper.net>,
        Dhruva Diveneni <ddevineni@juniper.net>,
        Georgi Vlaev <gvlaev@juniper.net>, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Yu-Lin Lu <ylu@juniper.net>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] Juniper DT based connector driver
Message-ID: <20161007153014.GC10482@kroah.com>
References: <1475853372-21997-1-git-send-email-pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1475853372-21997-1-git-send-email-pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 06:16:10PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Introduce a Juniper PTX router series DT overlay based
> connector driver.
> 
> This is submitted as an RFC since some OF infrastructure
> patches (like changeset helpers etc) are not yet mainlined.

staging drivers almost always need to at least build (or if not, have a
good reason why not.)

So don't post code until people can at least test-build it, otherwise no
one will care about it.  Would you review such code?

thanks,

greg k-h