From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753152AbcJJRUE (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2016 13:20:04 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:57092 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752232AbcJJRUB (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2016 13:20:01 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,325,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="18110725" Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:19:02 -0700 From: "Luck, Tony" To: Fenghua Yu Cc: Nilay Vaish , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Stephane Eranian , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , Shaohua Li , David Carrillo-Cisneros , Ravi V Shankar , Sai Prakhya , Vikas Shivappa , linux-kernel , x86 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/18] Documentation, x86: Documentation for Intel resource allocation user interface Message-ID: <20161010171902.GA30774@intel.com> References: <1475894763-64683-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> <1475894763-64683-6-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> <20161008203306.GA7672@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161008203306.GA7672@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 01:33:06PM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote: > On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 12:12:07PM -0500, Nilay Vaish wrote: > > On 7 October 2016 at 21:45, Fenghua Yu wrote: > > > From: Fenghua Yu > > > > > > +L3 details (code and data prioritization disabled) > > > +-------------------------------------------------- > > > +With CDP disabled the L3 schemata format is: > > > + > > > + L3:=;=;... > > > + > > > +L3 details (CDP enabled via mount option to resctrl) > > > +---------------------------------------------------- > > > +When CDP is enabled, you need to specify separate cache bit masks for > > > +code and data access. The generic format is: > > > + > > > + L3:=,;=,;... > > > > Can we drop L3 here and instead say: > > L:=,;=,;... > > > > and similarly for without CDP as well. > > L3 and L2 are similar but different. L2 doesn't have CDP feature. It would > be better to talk them separately here. > Perhaps we should document the general form, and then show examples for L3 (and later L2 and other resources as they are added). Note in particular that other resources are not cache-like ... so the pattern you see between L3 and L2 is short lived. Future resources that can be controlled are not caches. General form of a resource line is: {resource type}:[{resource instanceM}={resource value};]*N where "M" iterates over all online instances of this resource, and "N" is the total number. [and the ";" is a separator, not a terminator, but I'm not sure how to write that]. For the "L3" resource there are two formats for the value. With CDP enabled: {d-cache bit mask},{i-cache bit mask} with CDP disabled: {cache bit mask} "L2" resource doesn't support CDP, so the only format is {cache bit mask} The next resource coming will have values that are simple ranges {0 .. max} -Tony