From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1754175AbcJLCLc (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 11 Oct 2016 22:11:32 -0400
Received: from mail-pf0-f176.google.com ([209.85.192.176]:36627 "EHLO
        mail-pf0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1753126AbcJLCLW (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 11 Oct 2016 22:11:22 -0400
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 07:41:18 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, nm@ti.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org,
        linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, robh@kernel.org,
        broonie@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support
Message-ID: <20161012021118.GA19385@vireshk-i7>
References: <cover.1475581665.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <57FBEA16.2010502@ti.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <57FBEA16.2010502@ti.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 10-10-16, 14:20, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> Cool, I'm reviewing these patches still but I definitely plan to test them
> out on the TI platforms requiring multi-regulator support. At first glance
> it looks like it does give us the hooks we need. I believe we can use
> cpufreq-dt as is and just provide the regulators before it probes.

Yes you can. That's how I tested it as well.

-- 
viresh