From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1755555AbcJZQP0 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:15:26 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58630 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1753997AbcJZQPZ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:15:25 -0400
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:13:49 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] kthread: allocate kthread structure using
        kmalloc
Message-ID: <20161026161349.GC28832@redhat.com>
References: <20161025110508.9052-1-roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com> <20161025140333.GB4326@redhat.com> <20161025154301.GA12015@redhat.com> <CALCETrVmczve=knhYGrcXkeAXRQR_oY4ac2BSc7V0TEnx6-GFA@mail.gmail.com> <20161026141359.GA6893@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161026141359.GA6893@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:15:24 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Damn. sorry for noise, this doesn't really matter, but ...

On 10/26, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Yes, it needs cleanups and
> only because of kthread on stack.

What I actually tried to say is "NOT only because of kthread on stack".

Oleg.