From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1034107AbcJ0Pdo (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:33:44 -0400
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:33234 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1033145AbcJ0Pdj (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:33:39 -0400
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 17:32:03 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] driver core: Functional dependencies tracking
 support
Message-ID: <20161027153203.GA22804@kroah.com>
References: <27296716.H9VWo8ShOm@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <13957403.ZrB4mMbICz@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <2715729.9U1nlcpFb3@vostro.rjw.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2715729.9U1nlcpFb3@vostro.rjw.lan>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:51:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> +/*
> + * Device link flags.
> + *
> + * STATELESS: The core won't track the presence of supplier/consumer drivers.
> + * AUTOREMOVE: Remove this link automatically on consumer driver unbind.
> + */
> +#define DL_FLAG_STATELESS	(1 << 0)
> +#define DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE	(1 << 1)

Minor nit, BIT()?  I'll leave this for someone to send a checkpatch
cleanup patch later on :)

thanks,

greg k-h