From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S944350AbcJaPqn (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2016 11:46:43 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:60280 "EHLO pandora.armlinux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S944344AbcJaPqj (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2016 11:46:39 -0400 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:46:22 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson , Kevin Hilman , "Nori, Sekhar" Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] arm: assabet_defconfig: disable IDE subsystem Message-ID: <20161031154622.GB1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> References: <1467991490-24895-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <4818149.nzRaU7vJQE@amdc1976> <4264651.gPKphdYuCx@wuerfel> <1913139.FJW82OAuEF@amdc3058> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1913139.FJW82OAuEF@amdc3058> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 07:01:12PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 04:37:31 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 12:59:23 PM CEST Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, July 08, 2016 10:23:48 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Friday, July 8, 2016 5:24:41 PM CEST Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > > This patch disables deprecated IDE subsystem in assabet_defconfig > > > > > (no IDE host drivers are selected in this config so there is no > > > > > valid reason to enable IDE subsystem itself). > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > > > > > > > > I think the series makes a lot of sense. I have checked your assertions > > > > in the changelogs and found no flaws in your logic, so I think we should > > > > take them all through arm-soc unless there are other concerns. > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > Should I resend everything or just patches that were not reposted yet > > > (the ones that were marked as RFT initially and got no feedback)? > > > > I'd be fine with just getting a pull request with all the patches that > > had no negative feedback and that were not already applied (if any). > > Here it is (sorry for taking so long). I've just been digging in the dmesg logs from when I was using the Assabet+Neponset as my firewall, and it was having to use the IDE ide-cs driver rather than the pata pcmcia driver. I don't recall whether the pata pcmcia driver was a problem or not, as the PCMCIA interface can't cope with _any_ 32-bit accesses. I think PATA tries to use the "highest" possible access size by default... -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.