Re: [PATCHv2 5/6] arm64: Use __pa_symbol for _end

[Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>]

On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:00:53PM -0600, Laura Abbott wrote:
> 
> __pa_symbol is technically the marco that should be used for kernel
> symbols. Switch to this as a pre-requisite for DEBUG_VIRTUAL.

Nit: s/marco/macro/

I see there are some other uses of __pa() that look like they could/should be
__pa_symbol(), e.g. in mark_rodata_ro().

I guess strictly speaking those need to be updated to? Or is there a reason
that we should not?

Thanks,
Mark.

> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index 212c4d1..3236eb0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -209,8 +209,8 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
>  	 * linear mapping. Take care not to clip the kernel which may be
>  	 * high in memory.
>  	 */
> -	memblock_remove(max_t(u64, memstart_addr + linear_region_size, __pa(_end)),
> -			ULLONG_MAX);
> +	memblock_remove(max_t(u64, memstart_addr + linear_region_size,
> +			__pa_symbol(_end)), ULLONG_MAX);
>  	if (memstart_addr + linear_region_size < memblock_end_of_DRAM()) {
>  		/* ensure that memstart_addr remains sufficiently aligned */
>  		memstart_addr = round_up(memblock_end_of_DRAM() - linear_region_size,
> -- 
> 2.10.1
>