From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Jason@zx2c4.com
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, martin@strongswan.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] poly1305: generic C can be faster on chips with slow unaligned access
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 13:08:52 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161103.130852.1456848512897088071.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9oL-pOWWXXFhJz1vSm5ftnSfmYrquGbH0acapgEL=c4Ew@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 08:24:57 +0100
> Hi Herbert,
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>> FWIW I'd rather live with a 6% slowdown than having two different
>> code paths in the generic code. Anyone who cares about 6% would
>> be much better off writing an assembly version of the code.
>
> Please think twice before deciding that the generic C "is allowed to
> be slow".
In any event no piece of code should be doing 32-bit word reads from
addresses like "x + 3" without, at a very minimum, going through the
kernel unaligned access handlers.
Yet that is what the generic C poly1305 code is doing, all over the
place.
We know explicitly that these offsets will not be 32-bit aligned, so
it is required that we use the helpers, or alternatively do things to
avoid these unaligned accesses such as using temporary storage when
the HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS kconfig value is not set.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-03 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-02 17:58 [PATCH] poly1305: generic C can be faster on chips with slow unaligned access Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-11-02 20:09 ` Herbert Xu
2016-11-02 20:47 ` Sandy Harris
2016-11-02 21:06 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-11-02 21:08 ` Herbert Xu
2016-11-02 21:25 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-11-02 21:26 ` Herbert Xu
2016-11-02 22:00 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-11-03 0:49 ` Herbert Xu
2016-11-03 7:24 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-11-03 17:08 ` David Miller [this message]
2016-11-03 22:20 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-11-04 17:37 ` Eric Biggers
2016-11-07 18:08 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-11-07 18:23 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-11-07 18:26 ` Eric Biggers
2016-11-07 19:02 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-11-07 19:25 ` Eric Biggers
2016-11-07 19:41 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-11-07 19:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-11-07 19:43 ` [PATCH v3] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-11-12 23:27 ` kbuild test robot
2016-11-07 19:47 ` [PATCH v4] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2016-11-07 20:40 ` Eric Biggers
2016-11-08 7:52 ` Martin Willi
2016-11-08 17:26 ` Eric Biggers
2016-11-13 11:29 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161103.130852.1456848512897088071.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin@strongswan.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).