Results: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Election 2016

Results: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Election 2016

[Steven Rostedt]

The TAB elections are now complete. Thank you to all the candidates for
putting their names forward, and a big thank you to Grant Likely, Shuah
Khan, Jes Sorensen, H. Peter Anvin, Chris Mason and the Linux Foundation
staff who helped handle the election logistics.

With 108 ballots cast, the top 5 candidates received:

  Chris Mason, 81 votes
  Olof Johansson, 72 votes
  H. Peter Anvin, 61 votes
  Dan Williams, 59 votes
  Rik van Riel, 55 votes

The next highest voted candidate received 44 votes.

Full results are available on request.

Thanks again to everyone who participated, and congratulations to the
elected candidates.

-- Steve

Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Results: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Election 2016

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Steven,

On Thursday 03 Nov 2016 11:39:51 Steven Rostedt wrote:
> The TAB elections are now complete. Thank you to all the candidates for
> putting their names forward, and a big thank you to Grant Likely, Shuah
> Khan, Jes Sorensen, H. Peter Anvin, Chris Mason and the Linux Foundation
> staff who helped handle the election logistics.
> 
> With 108 ballots cast, the top 5 candidates received:
> 
>   Chris Mason, 81 votes
>   Olof Johansson, 72 votes
>   H. Peter Anvin, 61 votes
>   Dan Williams, 59 votes
>   Rik van Riel, 55 votes
> 
> The next highest voted candidate received 44 votes.
> 
> Full results are available on request.

Just curious, is there any particular reason to not publish the full results ?

Could you also share feedback on the automated ballot counting process ?

> Thanks again to everyone who participated, and congratulations to the
> elected candidates.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Results: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Election 2016

[Chris Mason]

On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 06:06:35PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>Hi Steven,
>
>On Thursday 03 Nov 2016 11:39:51 Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> The TAB elections are now complete. Thank you to all the candidates for
>> putting their names forward, and a big thank you to Grant Likely, Shuah
>> Khan, Jes Sorensen, H. Peter Anvin, Chris Mason and the Linux Foundation
>> staff who helped handle the election logistics.
>>
>> With 108 ballots cast, the top 5 candidates received:
>>
>> The next highest voted candidate received 44 votes.
>>
>> Full results are available on request.
>
>Just curious, is there any particular reason to not publish the full results ?
>
>Could you also share feedback on the automated ballot counting process 

Just nominating yourself and going through an election can be 
uncomfortable, at least it always is for me.  We are lucky to have a 
deeply qualified group, and I'd rather focus on encouraging people that didn't 
get elected this time to try again next year.

The ballots were counted by hand.  Grant, Steve and Shuah each counted 
every ballot and they verified that everyone got the same results.

We also test drove the optical scanning of the ballots with a tool 
called SDAPS (http://sdaps.org).  This was Peter's idea, and it ended up 
working very nicely.

Out of 108 ballots, sdaps missed a single vote and didn't have any false 
positives.  The optical scanning was faster than the hand counting, and 
we used the SDAPS gui to verify each ballot, and correct the single 
miss.  The gui is the major reason I trusted the result, it's minimal 
but really fast.  We used an off-the-shelf scanner, chosen because it 
was the fastest model that fit in my suitcase.

SDAPS recommends latex to design the ballot, and provides macros to make 
it fairly painless.  Latex brings its own frustrations, but it worked.

-chris

Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Results: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Election 2016

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Chris,

On Thursday 03 Nov 2016 10:47:03 Chris Mason wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 06:06:35PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 Nov 2016 11:39:51 Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >> The TAB elections are now complete. Thank you to all the candidates for
> >> putting their names forward, and a big thank you to Grant Likely, Shuah
> >> Khan, Jes Sorensen, H. Peter Anvin, Chris Mason and the Linux Foundation
> >> staff who helped handle the election logistics.
> >> 
> >> With 108 ballots cast, the top 5 candidates received:
> >> 
> >> The next highest voted candidate received 44 votes.
> >> 
> >> Full results are available on request.
> >
> >Just curious, is there any particular reason to not publish the full
> >results ?
> >
> >Could you also share feedback on the automated ballot counting process
> 
> Just nominating yourself and going through an election can be
> uncomfortable, at least it always is for me.  We are lucky to have a
> deeply qualified group, and I'd rather focus on encouraging people that
> didn't get elected this time to try again next year.
> 
> The ballots were counted by hand.  Grant, Steve and Shuah each counted
> every ballot and they verified that everyone got the same results.
> 
> We also test drove the optical scanning of the ballots with a tool
> called SDAPS (http://sdaps.org).  This was Peter's idea, and it ended up
> working very nicely.
> 
> Out of 108 ballots, sdaps missed a single vote and didn't have any false
> positives.  The optical scanning was faster than the hand counting, and
> we used the SDAPS gui to verify each ballot, and correct the single
> miss.  The gui is the major reason I trusted the result, it's minimal
> but really fast.  We used an off-the-shelf scanner, chosen because it
> was the fastest model that fit in my suitcase.
> 
> SDAPS recommends latex to design the ballot, and provides macros to make
> it fairly painless.  Latex brings its own frustrations, but it worked.

If it wasn't clear from my e-mail, I have complete trust in the TAP to hand 
count the ballots. I was curious about how the SDAPS automated process worked 
out, thank you for providing feedback about it.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Results: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Election 2016

[Chris Mason]

On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 08:38:44PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>Hi Chris,
>
>On Thursday 03 Nov 2016 10:47:03 Chris Mason wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 06:06:35PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > On Thursday 03 Nov 2016 11:39:51 Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> >> The TAB elections are now complete. Thank you to all the candidates for
>> >> putting their names forward, and a big thank you to Grant Likely, Shuah
>> >> Khan, Jes Sorensen, H. Peter Anvin, Chris Mason and the Linux Foundation
>> >> staff who helped handle the election logistics.
>> >>
>> >> With 108 ballots cast, the top 5 candidates received:
>> >>
>> >> The next highest voted candidate received 44 votes.
>> >>
>> >> Full results are available on request.
>> >
>> >Just curious, is there any particular reason to not publish the full
>> >results ?
>> >
>> >Could you also share feedback on the automated ballot counting process
>>
>> Just nominating yourself and going through an election can be
>> uncomfortable, at least it always is for me.  We are lucky to have a
>> deeply qualified group, and I'd rather focus on encouraging people that
>> didn't get elected this time to try again next year.
>>
>> The ballots were counted by hand.  Grant, Steve and Shuah each counted
>> every ballot and they verified that everyone got the same results.
>>
>> We also test drove the optical scanning of the ballots with a tool
>> called SDAPS.  This was Peter's idea, and it ended up
>> working very nicely.
>>
>> Out of 108 ballots, sdaps missed a single vote and didn't have any false
>> positives.  The optical scanning was faster than the hand counting, and
>> we used the SDAPS gui to verify each ballot, and correct the single
>> miss.  The gui is the major reason I trusted the result, it's minimal
>> but really fast.  We used an off-the-shelf scanner, chosen because it
>> was the fastest model that fit in my suitcase.
>>
>> SDAPS recommends latex to design the ballot, and provides macros to make
>> it fairly painless.  Latex brings its own frustrations, but it worked.
>
>If it wasn't clear from my e-mail, I have complete trust in the TAP to hand
>count the ballots. I was curious about how the SDAPS automated process worked
>out, thank you for providing feedback about it.

No problem, I couldn't remember if I'd mentioned the hand counting when 
I talked about the scanner during the election, so I was mostly 
clarifying for the list.

Thanks to everyone who stopped by to vote!

-chris