Hi!

> I'd prefer mails over bugzilla for now...
> 
> 4.9-rc2 has bios_limit:
> 
> pavel@duo:~$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/bios_limit
> 1833000
> 
> and it has thermal zones:
> 
> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone0/trip_point_0_temp 127000
> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone0/trip_point_0_type critical
> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone1/trip_point_0_temp 97000
> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone1/trip_point_0_type critical
> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone1/trip_point_1_temp 92500
> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone1/trip_point_1_type passive
> 
> ..so it should slow down CPU at 92C.
> 
> So lets push the temperature up a bit...
> 
> sudo watch cat /proc/acpi/ibm/thermal
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/bios_limit
> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone1/temp  /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_cur_freq
> 
> temperatures:   98 49 -128 85 28 -128 28 -128 49 58 -128 -128 -128
> -128 -128 -128
> 1833000
> 95000
> 1833000
> 
> Hmm. bios_limit does not seem to change, even when the temperature is
> clearly above the trip point. (It is also interestng that acpi/ibm
> reports bigger temperatures than
> /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone1/temp . I have seen 103C
> there.)

Under v4.8-rc, behaviour is different: bios_limit goes to 1GHz there
when temperature is around 84C at the thermal zone. That keeps
ibm/thermal temperatures under 90C, and no "thermal emergency"
messages in syslog.

So we seem to have thermal or ACPI regression in v4.9-rc3.

Best regards,
 
 									Pavel
 
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html