linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Zach Brown <zach.brown@ni.com>
Cc: <dwmw2@infradead.org>, <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	<richard@nod.at>, <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
	<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] mtd: use ONFI bad blocks per LUN to calculate UBI bad PEB limit
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 18:51:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161106185147.384f2e15@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1478024190-13713-1-git-send-email-zach.brown@ni.com>

On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 13:16:25 -0500
Zach Brown <zach.brown@ni.com> wrote:

> For ONFI-compliant NAND devices, the ONFI parameters report the maximum number
> of bad blocks per LUN that will be encountered over the lifetime of the device,
> so we can use that information to get a more accurate (and smaller) value for
> the UBI bad PEB limit.
> 
> The ONFI parameter "maxiumum number of bad blocks per LUN" is the max number of
> bad blocks that each individual LUN will ever ecounter. It is not the number of
> bad blocks to reserve for the nand device per LUN in the device.
> 
> This means that in the worst case a UBI device spanning X LUNs will encounter
> "maximum number of bad blocks per LUN" * X bad blocks. The implementation in
> this patch assumes this worst case and allocates bad block accordingly.
> 
> These patches are ordered in terms of their dependencies, but ideally, all 5
> would need to be applied for this to work as intended.

This series looks good to me.

Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electron.com>

Brian, Richard, any objections?

> 
> v1:
>  * Changed commit message to address concerns from v1[1] about this patch set
>    making best case assumptions.
> v2:
>  * Provided helper function for _max_bad_blocks
>  * Two new patches
>  * First new patch adds bb_per_lun and blocks_per_lun to nand_chip struct
>  * Second new patch sets the new fields during nand_flash_detect_onfi
>  * Max bad blocks calculation now uses the new nand_chip fields
> v3:
>  * Changed bb_per_lun and blocks_per_lun to bb_per_die and blocks_per_die
>  * Corrected type of bb_per_die and blocks_per_die from little endian to host
>    unsigned int
> 
> [1]
> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1505.1/04822.html
> 
> 
> Jeff Westfahl (2):
>   mtd: introduce function max_bad_blocks
>   mtd: ubi: use 'max_bad_blocks' to compute bad_peb_limit if available
> 
> Zach Brown (3):
>   mtd: nand: Add bb_per_die and blocks_per_die fields to nand_chip
>   mtd: nand: implement 'max_bad_blocks' mtd function
>   mtd: nand: set bb_per_die and blocks_per_die for ONFI compliant chips
> 
>  drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c        | 13 +++++++++++++
>  drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c      |  4 ++++
>  include/linux/mtd/mtd.h      | 11 +++++++++++
>  include/linux/mtd/nand.h     |  5 +++++
>  5 files changed, 72 insertions(+)
> 
> --
> 2.7.4
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-06 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-01 18:16 [PATCH v4 0/5] mtd: use ONFI bad blocks per LUN to calculate UBI bad PEB limit Zach Brown
2016-11-01 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] mtd: introduce function max_bad_blocks Zach Brown
2016-11-01 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] mtd: ubi: use 'max_bad_blocks' to compute bad_peb_limit if available Zach Brown
2016-11-01 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] mtd: nand: Add bb_per_die and blocks_per_die fields to nand_chip Zach Brown
2016-11-06 17:49   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-11-01 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] mtd: nand: implement 'max_bad_blocks' mtd function Zach Brown
2016-11-01 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] mtd: nand: set bb_per_die and blocks_per_die for ONFI compliant chips Zach Brown
2016-11-06 17:51 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161106185147.384f2e15@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=zach.brown@ni.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).