From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753620AbcKGNZN (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 7 Nov 2016 08:25:13 -0500
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:51763 "EHLO
        Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752561AbcKGNZK (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 7 Nov 2016 08:25:10 -0500
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 14:25:01 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rt@linutronix.de,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
        x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/25] x86/mcheck: Split threshold_cpu_callback into two
 callbacks
Message-ID: <20161107132500.ptxf6b4ql56pketo@linutronix.de>
References: <20161103145021.28528-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
 <20161103145021.28528-22-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
 <20161107132040.w6oaoe2hu6hpdvy4@pd.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161107132040.w6oaoe2hu6hpdvy4@pd.tnic>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161014 (1.7.1)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 2016-11-07 14:20:40 [+0100], Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Let's get rid of those pointers and pointer testing and export the
> create/remove functions directly.

This moves it 1:1 (well, more or less). Wouldn't you prefer doing it as
separate patch/change?

> How's that? It builds here.
CONFIG_X86_MCE_AMD is where the callback is implemented. Wouldn't that
be broken now?

Sebastian