From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754428AbcKHVYo (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2016 16:24:44 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:38778 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753940AbcKHVYn (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2016 16:24:43 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 22:24:39 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: "Luck, Tony" , linux-edac , X86 ML , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/MCE: Remove MCP_TIMESTAMP Message-ID: <20161108212439.smukc7ayq7bvo6qd@pd.tnic> References: <20161101120911.13163-1-bp@alien8.de> <20161105131104.drouavgezizz4w7v@pd.tnic> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F3A22720B@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> <20161107180853.4uxlvtoychzhwr2q@pd.tnic> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F3A22728C@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> <20161108180932.wvvcbbzrzrai26eg@pd.tnic> <20161108210819.gx7bfw7pfx4e6tf4@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161014 (1.7.1) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 10:14:04PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > And yes, you should spend the extra cycles. Adding a flags argument to > mce_setup() and propagate it through the various callsites shouldn't be > that hard and would make the stuff obvious instead of obfuscated. Sure, that's already on my TODO. I want to take a look at it when I have a quiet moment. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.