From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965941AbcKOFMU (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:12:20 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:48511 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965235AbcKOFMT (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:12:19 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,640,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="31389303" Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 21:11:54 -0800 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Peter Huewe , Marcel Selhorst , Christophe Ricard , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: drop chip->is_open and chip->duration_adjusted Message-ID: <20161115051106.u2xoduwf2kpcznv3@intel.com> References: <20161114234500.24839-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20161115043001.GA22482@obsidianresearch.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161115043001.GA22482@obsidianresearch.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-08-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 09:30:01PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 03:44:58PM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > Use atomic bitops for chip->flags so that we do not need chip->is_open > > and chip->duration_adjusted anymore. > > I don't know if it s a really great idea to use atomic bit ops for > things that do not need to be atomic.. It makes the locking scheme > less clear. is open is genuinely different since it relies on the > atomic for correctness. The way I see it is one of the status flags bound to chip among the others. I do not see this cause too much harm for clarity. It eases debugging the driver a bit because you get more state out of 'flags'. It also makes code little a bit more robust as flags is independent of locks. How strong is your opposition here? I do not see any exceptional damage done but see some subtle but still significant benefits. > Merging is_duration makes lots of sense though Also timeout_adjusted should be merged (for some reason missed it). > Jason /Jarkko