From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1755535AbcKOHeU (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 15 Nov 2016 02:34:20 -0500
Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:34995 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752217AbcKOHeS (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 15 Nov 2016 02:34:18 -0500
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:34:13 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 0/7] perf sched: Introduce timehist command, again (v1)
Message-ID: <20161115073413.GA7016@gmail.com>
References: <20161114161243.15403-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
 <20161115064214.GB27089@gmail.com>
 <20161115065509.GB16821@danjae.aot.lge.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161115065509.GB16821@danjae.aot.lge.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:

> > > By default it shows the individual schedule events, including the time between
> > > sched-in events for the task, the task scheduling delay (time between wakeup
> > > and actually running) and run time for the task:
> > > 
> > >            time cpu  task name[tid/pid]    b/n time sch delay  run time
> > >   ------------- ---- -------------------- --------- --------- ---------
> > >    79371.874569 [11] gcc[31949]               0.014     0.000     1.148
> > >    79371.874591 [10] gcc[31951]               0.000     0.000     0.024
> > >    79371.874603 [10] migration/10[59]         3.350     0.004     0.011
> > >    79371.874604 [11] <idle>                   1.148     0.000     0.035
> > >    79371.874723 [05] <idle>                   0.016     0.000     1.383
> > >    79371.874746 [05] gcc[31949]               0.153     0.078     0.022
> > > ...
> > 
> > What does the 'b/n' abbreviation stand for? 'Between'? Could we call the column 
> > 'sch wait' instead, or so?
> 
> Looks better, or what about 'wait time'?

Works for me!

> I'd go with the first option - simply adding arrows.  It's good enough to 
> identify each function IMHO.

Ok!

Thanks,

	Ingo