linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com>
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Linux SCSI Mailinglist <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libfc: fix seconds_since_last_reset miscalculation
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:18:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161115091840.7cldqui4dpi7nrz5@linux-x5ow.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR02MB16830DECB29262BACBA94FA681A60@BLUPR02MB1683.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>

On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:04:43PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:

[...]

> Hello Johannes,
> 
> I think the above code will miscalculate seconds_since_last_reset if 
> 'jiffies' wraps around after an lport has been created and before 
> seconds_since_last_reset is computed. Shouldn't seconds_since_last_reset 
> be computed as follows?
> 
> 	fc_stats->seconds_since_last_reset = (jiffies - boot_time) / HZ;

But what happens when jiffies - boot_time becomes negative? Then we
reintroduce the bug again and have 'fcoeadm -s' show weird values.

Byte,
	Johannes
-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                                          Storage
jthumshirn@suse.de                                +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-15  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-08  8:44 [PATCH] libfc: fix seconds_since_last_reset miscalculation Johannes Thumshirn
2016-11-08 15:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-15  9:18   ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2016-11-15 14:50     ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-15 15:05       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-11-16 16:58         ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-11-17  8:12           ` Johannes Thumshirn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161115091840.7cldqui4dpi7nrz5@linux-x5ow.site \
    --to=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).