From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752905AbcKRPgR (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:36:17 -0500
Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:46354 "EHLO
        merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751527AbcKRPgQ (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:36:16 -0500
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 16:36:15 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
        Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 2/6] Improve the tracking of active utilisation
Message-ID: <20161118153615.GM3142@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1477317998-7487-1-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.it>
 <1477317998-7487-3-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1477317998-7487-3-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.it>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 04:06:34PM +0200, Luca Abeni wrote:
> @@ -514,7 +556,20 @@ static void update_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
>  	struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se);
>  	struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq);
>  
> +	if (hrtimer_is_queued(&dl_se->inactive_timer)) {
> +		hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&dl_se->inactive_timer);
> +		WARN_ON(dl_task_of(dl_se)->nr_cpus_allowed > 1);

Isn't that always so? That is, DL tasks cannot be but 'global', right?

Also, you could use the return value of hrtimer_try_to_cancel() to
determine hrtimer_is_queued() I suppose.

> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * The "inactive timer" has been cancelled in
> +		 * select_task_rq_dl() (and the acvive utilisation has
> +		 * been decreased). So, increase the active utilisation.
> +		 * If select_task_rq_dl() could not cancel the timer,
> +		 * inactive_task_timer() will * find the task state as
                                             ^^^
superfluous '*'?

> +		 * TASK_RUNNING, and will do nothing, so we are still safe.
> +		 */
> +		add_running_bw(dl_se, dl_rq);
> +	}
>  
>  	if (dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, rq_clock(rq)) ||
>  	    dl_entity_overflow(dl_se, pi_se, rq_clock(rq))) {