From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754749AbcKUPh7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:37:59 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0108.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.108]:41107 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754142AbcKUPh5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:37:57 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1539:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3874:5007:6261:6742:7875:7903:10004:10400:10848:10967:11232:11658:11914:12663:12740:12760:13069:13149:13230:13311:13357:13439:14181:14659:21080:21212:21324:30054:30090:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:3,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: drop60_621dda49ac563 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1961 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:37:52 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Cyril Hrubis Cc: Dmitry Vyukov , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, LKML , mtk.manpages@gmail.com, Thomas Gleixner , Sasha Levin , Mathieu Desnoyers , scientist@fb.com, Arnd Bergmann , carlos@redhat.com, syzkaller , Kostya Serebryany , Mike Frysinger , Dave Jones , Tavis Ormandy Subject: Re: Formal description of system call interface Message-ID: <20161121103752.70ad1418@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20161107103819.GA11374@rei.lan> References: <20161107103819.GA11374@rei.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:38:20 +0100 Cyril Hrubis wrote: > I'm not sure if something like this is really doable or in the scope of > this project, but it may be worth a try. > Looking ahead into the future, I was also thinking that if this becomes robust, we could also start an integration specification, that could describe how different system calls interact with each other. Like open() to read(), write() and close(). But this is just an idea that popped in my head while reading this thread. We want to start small first, but still could keep this in the back of our minds for future enhancements. -- Steve