From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933168AbcKXQ2v (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2016 11:28:51 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:41091 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757159AbcKXQ2t (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2016 11:28:49 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 17:28:44 +0100 From: Petr Mladek To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , Tejun Heo , Calvin Owens , Thomas Gleixner , Mel Gorman , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Laura Abbott , Andy Lutomirski , Linus Torvalds , Kees Cook , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHv4 1/6] printk: use vprintk_func in vprintk() Message-ID: <20161124162844.GE24103@pathway.suse.cz> References: <20161027154933.1211-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20161027154933.1211-2-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161027154933.1211-2-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri 2016-10-28 00:49:28, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > vprintk(), just like printk(), better be using per-cpu printk_func > instead of direct vprintk_emit() call. Just in case if vprintk() > will ever be called from NMI, or from any other context that can > deadlock in printk(). > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt Makes sense. Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek Best Regards, Petr