From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933655AbcK2Nbx (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:31:53 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:41966 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755231AbcK2Nbw (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:31:52 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:31:41 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Babu Moger , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Kees Cook , Dan Williams , Andrey Ryabinin , Tejun Heo , Sam Ravnborg , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , sparclinux , Linux-Renesas Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Ajust lockdep static allocations for sparc Message-ID: <20161129133141.GK3092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1475004808-91920-1-git-send-email-babu.moger@oracle.com> <20161129114103.GE3092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20161129122907.GH3092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 02:26:47PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 12:52:04PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> Not because of platforms with not limited memory, but because of platforms > >> with boot loaders that have silly kernel size limitations, and start > >> scribbling over the DTB or even theirselves when copying a large kernel image. > > > > Right, that's the weird platforms clause above, and those can select the > > option. > > Their Kconfig files can select it. The users can't. > What about making it visible depending on EXPERT? Not understanding, why would a user ever need it? The platform knows if its has funny boot image size limits, no?