linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] intelrdt: resctrl: recommend locking for resctrlfs
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 20:07:04 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161202220702.GA31213@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1612021211050.4295@nanos>

On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 12:20:29PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > 
> > There is a locking problem between different applications
> > reading/writing to resctrlfs directory at the same time (read the patch
> > below for details).
> > 
> > Suggest a standard locking scheme for applications to use.
> 
> ....
> 
> > +To coordinate atomic operations on resctrl and avoid the problem
> > +above, the following locking procedure is recommended:
> > +
> > +A) open /var/lock/resctrl/fs.lock with O_CREAT|O_EXCL.
> > +B) if success, write pid of program accessing the directory
> > +   structure to this file.
> > +C) read/write the directory structure.
> > +D) remove file.
> 
> What's wrong with using flock, which works from shell scripts as well?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx

Hi Thomas,

Nothing wrong with it... I'm just copying the behaviour of other
programs.

Actually, using flock(2) allows one to use LOCK_SH for readers and 
this allows consistent writer/reader behaviour (say, a reader
won't see a partially written directory).

NAME
       flock - apply or remove an advisory lock on an open file

SYNOPSIS
       #include <sys/file.h>

       int flock(int fd, int operation);

DESCRIPTION
       Apply  or remove an advisory lock on the open file specified by
fd.  The argument operation is one of
       the following:

           LOCK_SH  Place a shared lock.  More than one process may hold
a shared lock for a given file at a
                    given time.

           LOCK_EX  Place  an  exclusive lock.  Only one process may
hold an exclusive lock for a given file
                    at a given time.

           LOCK_UN  Remove an existing lock held by this process.

--- 

So the procedure would be:

    /var/lock/resctrl/fs.lock created previously in the filesystem.

WRITE LOCK:

A) Take flock(EXCLUSIVE) on /var/lock/resctrl/fs.lock
B) If success, write pid of the program to the file.
C) read/write the directory structure.
D) funlock

READ LOCK:

A) Take flock(SHARED) on /var/lock/resctrl/fs.lock
B) If success read the directory structure.
C) funlock


How about that?

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-02 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-30 15:48 [PATCH] intelrdt: resctrl: recommend locking for resctrlfs Marcelo Tosatti
2016-11-30 21:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-11-30 22:05 ` Fenghua Yu
2016-11-30 22:25   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2016-12-01 21:54     ` Fenghua Yu
2016-12-01 14:55   ` [PATCH v2] " Marcelo Tosatti
2016-12-02 11:20     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-02 22:07       ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2016-12-09  9:35         ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-14 17:08       ` [PATCH v3] " Marcelo Tosatti
2016-12-15 13:49         ` [tip:x86/cache] Documentation, x86, resctrl: Recommend " tip-bot for Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161202220702.GA31213@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).