From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752406AbcLEVXG (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:23:06 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:38192 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751340AbcLEVXE (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:23:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 14:23:01 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , LKML , Brian Norris , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Update Documentation/00-INDEX Message-ID: <20161205142301.58f5a129@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 09:41:40 -0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > So, in order to check it, I wrote a small script that compares the files > and directories at Documentation/ with the ones at 00-INDEX. > > Then, I synchronized the entries, making the script happy. > > We might think on integrating the script with checkpatch.pl, but, as > we should get rid of 00-INDEX, it probably not worth the efforts. I would agree with that; I don't see the point of keeping those files around in the longer term. I've applied the set. I do have a few quibbles with the final patch that I'll send separately, but they're not something to hold this set up for. Thanks, jon