From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751670AbcLEOqf (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2016 09:46:35 -0500 Received: from mail-oi0-f68.google.com ([209.85.218.68]:33023 "EHLO mail-oi0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751096AbcLEOqb (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2016 09:46:31 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 08:46:21 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Serge Semin Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, andrew@lunn.ch, mark.rutland@arm.com, Sergey.Semin@t-platforms.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] eeprom: Add IDT 89HPESx driver bindings file Message-ID: <20161205144621.yxwr7spmsvyilan5@rob-hp-laptop> References: <1475450025-29507-1-git-send-email-fancer.lancer@gmail.com> <1480372701-30560-1-git-send-email-fancer.lancer@gmail.com> <1480372701-30560-3-git-send-email-fancer.lancer@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1480372701-30560-3-git-send-email-fancer.lancer@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-08-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 01:38:21AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > See cover-letter for changelog > > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin > > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/misc/idt_89hpesx.txt | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++ There's not a better location for this? I can't tell because you don't describe what the device is. > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/idt_89hpesx.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/idt_89hpesx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/idt_89hpesx.txt > index 0000000..469cc93 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/idt_89hpesx.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ > +EEPROM / CSR SMBus-slave interface of IDT 89HPESx devices > + > +Required properties: > + - compatible : should be "," > + Basically there is only one manufacturer: idt, but some > + compatible devices may be produced in future. Following devices > + are supported: 89hpes8nt2, 89hpes12nt3, 89hpes24nt6ag2, > + 89hpes32nt8ag2, 89hpes32nt8bg2, 89hpes12nt12g2, 89hpes16nt16g2, > + 89hpes24nt24g2, 89hpes32nt24ag2, 89hpes32nt24bg2; > + 89hpes12n3, 89hpes12n3a, 89hpes24n3, 89hpes24n3a; > + 89hpes32h8, 89hpes32h8g2, 89hpes48h12, 89hpes48h12g2, > + 89hpes48h12ag2, 89hpes16h16, 89hpes22h16, 89hpes22h16g2, > + 89hpes34h16, 89hpes34h16g2, 89hpes64h16, 89hpes64h16g2, > + 89hpes64h16ag2; > + 89hpes12t3g2, 89hpes24t3g2, 89hpes16t4, 89hpes4t4g2, > + 89hpes10t4g2, 89hpes16t4g2, 89hpes16t4ag2, 89hpes5t5, > + 89hpes6t5, 89hpes8t5, 89hpes8t5a, 89hpes24t6, 89hpes6t6g2, > + 89hpes24t6g2, 89hpes16t7, 89hpes32t8, 89hpes32t8g2, > + 89hpes48t12, 89hpes48t12g2. > + Current implementation of the driver doesn't have any device- Driver capabilties are irrelevant to bindings. > + specific functionalities. But since each of them differs > + by registers mapping, CSRs read/write restrictions can be > + added in future. > + - reg : I2C address of the IDT 89HPES device. > + > +Optional properties: > + - read-only : Parameterless property disables writes to the EEPROM > + - idt,eesize : Size of EEPROM device connected to IDT 89HPES i2c-master bus > + (default value is 4096 bytes if option isn't specified) > + - idt,eeaddr : Custom address of EEPROM device > + (If not specified IDT 89HPESx device will try to communicate > + with EEPROM sited by default address - 0x50) Don't we already have standard EEPROM properties that could be used here? > + > +Example: > + idt_pcie_sw@60 { Don't use '_'. > + compatible = "idt,89hpes12nt3"; > + reg = <0x60>; > + read-only; > + idt,eesize = <65536>; > + idt,eeaddr = <0x50>; > + }; > -- > 2.6.6 >