linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Matthew Whitehead <tedheadster@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] x86/cpu: Re-apply forced caps every time cpu caps are re-read
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 09:57:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161206085726.b6jaxmtjse5oa2od@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e04d96bf465d5153aa29fb885fc038c254c441f1.1480985979.git.luto@kernel.org>

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:01:12PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Calling get_cpu_cap() will reset a bunch of CPU features.  This will
> cause the system to lose track of force-set and force-cleared
> featueres in the words that are reset until the end of CPU
> initialization.  This can cause X86_FEATURE_FPU, for example, to
> change back and forth during boot and potentially confuse CPU setup.
> 
> To minimize the chance of confusion, re-apply forced caps every time
> get_cpu_cap() is called.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> index 347ae0a19380..24e1e4004d42 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> @@ -758,6 +758,13 @@ void get_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  		c->x86_capability[CPUID_8000_000A_EDX] = cpuid_edx(0x8000000a);
>  
>  	init_scattered_cpuid_features(c);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Clear/Set all flags overridden by options, after probe.
> +	 * This needs to happen each time we re-probe, which may happen
> +	 * several times during CPU initialization.
> +	 */
> +	apply_forced_caps(c);

I guess...

Although I have to say all that early capabilities detection has grown
a lot of cruft during the years and is nuts. And calling get_cpu_cap()
multiple times is simply plain wrong.

What we should do is read CPUID *once*, filter out caps and set our
internal representation bits and be done with it.

Stuff like setup_pku() which *sets* CPUID bits will then have to run
*before* we do the detection and that's it.

But I guess that's future work.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-06  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-06  1:01 [RFC PATCH 0/6] CPUID and FPU fixes Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-06  1:01 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] x86/CPU: Add X86_FEATURE_CPUID Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-06  8:08   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-12-06  1:01 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] x86/cpu: Factor out application of forced cpu caps Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-06  8:32   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-12-06  1:01 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] x86/cpu: Re-apply forced caps every time cpu caps are re-read Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-06  8:57   ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2016-12-06  1:01 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] x86/fpu: Fix "x86/fpu: Legacy x87 FPU detected" message Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-06  9:24   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-12-06 17:59     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-06 18:04       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-12-06  1:01 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] x86/fpu: Fix CPUID-less FPU detection Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-06  9:40   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-12-06 17:52     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-07  9:42       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-12-06  1:01 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] x86/fpu: Fix the "Giving up, no FPU found" test Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161206085726.b6jaxmtjse5oa2od@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=tedheadster@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).