From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932322AbcLGKq7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2016 05:46:59 -0500 Received: from mail-wj0-f176.google.com ([209.85.210.176]:35351 "EHLO mail-wj0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752966AbcLGKq4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2016 05:46:56 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 10:50:02 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Benjamin Gaignard Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, Mark Rutland , alexandre.torgue@st.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thierry Reding , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron , knaack.h@gmx.de, Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Fabrice Gasnier , Gerald Baeza , Arnaud Pouliquen , Linus Walleij , Linaro Kernel Mailman List , Benjamin Gaignard Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] IIO: add STM32 timer trigger driver Message-ID: <20161207105002.GA3625@dell.home> References: <1481027929-13704-1-git-send-email-benjamin.gaignard@st.com> <1481027929-13704-7-git-send-email-benjamin.gaignard@st.com> <20161206131635.GJ25385@dell.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2 (2016-07-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 06 Dec 2016, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > [snip] > >> + > >> +static const char * const triggers0[] = { > >> + TIM1_TRGO, TIM1_CH1, TIM1_CH2, TIM1_CH3, TIM1_CH4, NULL, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static const char * const triggers1[] = { > >> + TIM2_TRGO, TIM2_CH1, TIM2_CH2, TIM2_CH3, TIM2_CH4, NULL, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static const char * const triggers2[] = { > >> + TIM3_TRGO, TIM3_CH1, TIM3_CH2, TIM3_CH3, TIM3_CH4, NULL, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static const char * const triggers3[] = { > >> + TIM4_TRGO, TIM4_CH1, TIM4_CH2, TIM4_CH3, TIM4_CH4, NULL, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static const char * const triggers4[] = { > >> + TIM5_TRGO, TIM5_CH1, TIM5_CH2, TIM5_CH3, TIM5_CH4, NULL, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static const char * const triggers5[] = { > >> + TIM6_TRGO, NULL, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static const char * const triggers6[] = { > >> + TIM7_TRGO, NULL, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static const char * const triggers7[] = { > >> + TIM8_TRGO, TIM8_CH1, TIM8_CH2, TIM8_CH3, TIM8_CH4, NULL, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static const char * const triggers8[] = { > >> + TIM9_TRGO, TIM9_CH1, TIM9_CH2, NULL, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static const char * const triggers9[] = { > >> + TIM12_TRGO, TIM12_CH1, TIM12_CH2, NULL, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static const void *triggers_table[] = { > >> + triggers0, > >> + triggers1, > >> + triggers2, > >> + triggers3, > >> + triggers4, > >> + triggers5, > >> + triggers6, > >> + triggers7, > >> + triggers8, > >> + triggers9, > >> +}; > > > > What about: > > > > static const char * const triggers[][] = { > > { TIM1_TRGO, TIM1_CH1, TIM1_CH2, TIM1_CH3, TIM1_CH4, NULL }, > > { TIM2_TRGO, TIM2_CH1, TIM2_CH2, TIM2_CH3, TIM2_CH4, NULL }, > > { TIM3_TRGO, TIM3_CH1, TIM3_CH2, TIM3_CH3, TIM3_CH4, NULL }, > > { TIM4_TRGO, TIM4_CH1, TIM4_CH2, TIM4_CH3, TIM4_CH4, NULL }, > > { TIM5_TRGO, TIM5_CH1, TIM5_CH2, TIM5_CH3, TIM5_CH4, NULL }, > > { TIM6_TRGO, NULL }, > > { TIM7_TRGO, NULL }, > > { TIM8_TRGO, TIM8_CH1, TIM8_CH2, TIM8_CH3, TIM8_CH4, NULL }, > > { TIM9_TRGO, TIM9_CH1, TIM9_CH2, NULL }, > > { TIM12_TRGO, TIM12_CH1, TIM12_CH2, NULL } > > }; > > I can't because the second dimension of the array isn't fix. > I could have between 2 and 6 elements per row... to create a dual dimension > array I would have to add NULL entries like that: > > #define MAX_TRIGGERS 6 > > static const void *triggers_table[][MAX_TRIGGERS] = { > { TIM1_TRGO, TIM1_CH1, TIM1_CH2, TIM1_CH3, TIM1_CH4, NULL,}, > { TIM2_TRGO, TIM2_CH1, TIM2_CH2, TIM2_CH3, TIM2_CH4, NULL,}, > { TIM3_TRGO, TIM3_CH1, TIM3_CH2, TIM3_CH3, TIM3_CH4, NULL,}, > { TIM4_TRGO, TIM4_CH1, TIM4_CH2, TIM4_CH3, TIM4_CH4, NULL,}, > { TIM5_TRGO, TIM5_CH1, TIM5_CH2, TIM5_CH3, TIM5_CH4, NULL,}, > { TIM6_TRGO, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,}, > { TIM7_TRGO, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,}, > { TIM8_TRGO, TIM8_CH1, TIM8_CH2, TIM8_CH3, TIM8_CH4, NULL,}, > { TIM9_TRGO, TIM9_CH1, TIM9_CH2, NULL, NULL, NULL,}, > { TIM12_TRGO, TIM12_CH1, TIM12_CH2, NULL, NULL, NULL,}, > }; It was just an idea, not a tested implementation. I don't understand why you have to pad with NULLs, but either way, it looks much better than before and saves lots of lines of code. > >> +static const char * const valids0[] = { > >> + TIM5_TRGO, TIM2_TRGO, TIM4_TRGO, TIM3_TRGO, NULL, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static const char * const valids1[] = { > >> + TIM1_TRGO, TIM8_TRGO, TIM3_TRGO, TIM4_TRGO, NULL, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static const char * const valids2[] = { > >> + TIM1_TRGO, TIM8_TRGO, TIM5_TRGO, TIM4_TRGO, NULL, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static const char * const valids3[] = { > >> + TIM1_TRGO, TIM2_TRGO, TIM3_TRGO, TIM8_TRGO, NULL, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static const char *const valids4[] = { > >> + TIM2_TRGO, TIM3_TRGO, TIM4_TRGO, TIM8_TRGO, NULL, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static const char * const valids7[] = { > >> + TIM1_TRGO, TIM2_TRGO, TIM4_TRGO, TIM5_TRGO, NULL, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static const char * const valids8[] = { > >> + TIM2_TRGO, TIM3_TRGO, NULL, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static const char * const valids9[] = { > >> + TIM4_TRGO, TIM5_TRGO, NULL, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static const void *valids_table[] = { > >> + valids0, > >> + valids1, > >> + valids2, > >> + valids3, > >> + valids4, > >> + NULL, > >> + NULL, > >> + valids7, > >> + valids8, > >> + valids9, > >> +}; > > > > Same here. > > -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog